Low-cost indoor positioning system using BLE (bluetooth low energy) based sensor fusion with constrained extended Kalman Filter

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyoin Bae ◽  
Jaesung Oh ◽  
KangKyu Lee ◽  
Jun-Ho Oh
Keyword(s):  
Kalman Filter ◽  
Sensor Fusion ◽  
Extended Kalman Filter ◽  
Low Cost ◽  
Indoor Positioning ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Positioning System ◽  
Bluetooth Low Energy ◽  
Indoor Positioning System

scholarly journals A Low Cost Indoor Positioning System Using Bluetooth Low Energy

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 136858-136871
Author(s):  
Lu Bai ◽  
Fabio Ciravegna ◽  
Raymond Bond ◽  
Maurice Mulvenna
Keyword(s):  
Low Cost ◽  
Indoor Positioning ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Positioning System ◽  
Bluetooth Low Energy ◽  
Indoor Positioning System

WiFi and Bluetooth Low Energy Beacons for Indoor Positioning System

2019 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 1-5
Author(s):  
Nurul Fatehah Zulkpli ◽  
Nor Azlina Ab. Aziz ◽  
Noor Ziela Abd Rahman ◽  
Rosli Besar
Keyword(s):  
Indoor Positioning ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Location Based Services ◽  
Positioning System ◽  
Indoor Environments ◽  
Wireless Technologies ◽  
Bluetooth Low Energy ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Performance Accuracy ◽  
Indoor Positioning System

Indoor Positioning System (IPS) is used to locate a person, an object or a location inside a building. IPS is important in providing location-based services, which has recently gain much popularity. The services ease visitors’ navigation at unfamiliar premises. Location-based services depend on the capability of IPS to accurately determine the location of the user, which is a challenging issue in indoor environments. Several wireless technologies are available. In this paper, two of the most widely used IPS technologies are reviewed which are, WiFi and Bluetooth low energy (BLE). Their advantages and disadvantages are reviewed and reported here. Comparison of the systems based on their performance, accuracy and limitations are presented as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document