Software reliability modeling of fault detection and correction processes

2009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanjun Shu ◽  
Zhibo Wu ◽  
Hongwei Liu ◽  
Xiaozong Yang
Keyword(s):  
Fault Detection ◽  
Software Reliability ◽  
Reliability Modeling

scholarly journals Software Reliability Modeling Incorporating Fault Detection and Fault Correction Processes with Testing Coverage and Fault Amount Dependency

Mathematics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 60
Author(s):  
Qiuying Li ◽  
Hoang Pham
Keyword(s):  
Fault Detection ◽  
Software Reliability ◽  
Estimation Methods ◽  
Time Dependency ◽  
Modeling Framework ◽  
Reliability Modeling ◽  
Imperfect Debugging ◽  
Detection Process ◽  
Correction Process ◽  
Testing Coverage

This paper presents a general testing coverage software reliability modeling framework that covers imperfect debugging and considers not only fault detection processes (FDP) but also fault correction processes (FCP). Numerous software reliability growth models have evaluated the reliability of software over the last few decades, but most of them attached importance to modeling the fault detection process rather than modeling the fault correction process. Previous studies analyzed the time dependency between the fault detection and correction processes and modeled the fault correction process as a delayed detection process with a random or deterministic time delay. We study the quantitative dependency between dual processes from the viewpoint of fault amount dependency instead of time dependency, then propose a generalized modeling framework along with imperfect debugging and testing coverage. New models are derived by adopting different testing coverage functions. We compared the performance of these proposed models with existing models under the context of two kinds of failure data, one of which only includes observations of faults detected, and the other includes not only fault detection but also fault correction data. Different parameter estimation methods and performance comparison criteria are presented according to the characteristics of different kinds of datasets. No matter what kind of data, the comparison results reveal that the proposed models generally give improved descriptive and predictive performance than existing models.

scholarly journals Modeling Software Fault-Detection and Fault-Correction Processes by Considering the Dependencies between Fault Amounts

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (15) ◽  
pp. 6998
Author(s):  
Qiuying Li ◽  
Hoang Pham
Keyword(s):  
Time Delay ◽  
Fault Detection ◽  
Software Reliability ◽  
Growth Models ◽  
Predictive Performance ◽  
Real Data ◽  
Reliability Estimation ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Dual Processes ◽  
Correction Process

Many NHPP software reliability growth models (SRGMs) have been proposed to assess software reliability during the past 40 years, but most of them have focused on modeling the fault detection process (FDP) in two ways: one is to ignore the fault correction process (FCP), i.e., faults are assumed to be instantaneously removed after the failure caused by the faults is detected. However, in real software development, it is not always reliable as fault removal usually needs time, i.e., the faults causing failures cannot always be removed at once and the detected failures will become more and more difficult to correct as testing progresses. Another way to model the fault correction process is to consider the time delay between the fault detection and fault correction. The time delay has been assumed to be constant and function dependent on time or random variables following some kind of distribution. In this paper, some useful approaches to the modeling of dual fault detection and correction processes are discussed. The dependencies between fault amounts of dual processes are considered instead of fault correction time-delay. A model aiming to integrate fault-detection processes and fault-correction processes, along with the incorporation of a fault introduction rate and testing coverage rate into the software reliability evaluation is proposed. The model parameters are estimated using the Least Squares Estimation (LSE) method. The descriptive and predictive performance of this proposed model and other existing NHPP SRGMs are investigated by using three real data-sets based on four criteria, respectively. The results show that the new model can be significantly effective in yielding better reliability estimation and prediction.

scholarly journals NHPP Software Reliability Model with Inflection Factor of the Fault Detection Rate Considering the Uncertainty of Software Operating Environments and Predictive Analysis

Symmetry ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Song ◽  
Chang ◽  
Pham
Keyword(s):  
Fault Detection ◽  
Software Reliability ◽  
Detection Rate ◽  
The Other ◽  
Reliability Model ◽  
New Model ◽  
Software Failures ◽  
Software Failure ◽  
Software Reliability Model ◽  
Operating Environments

The non-homogeneous Poisson process (NHPP) software has a crucial role in computer systems. Furthermore, the software is used in various environments. It was developed and tested in a controlled environment, while real-world operating environments may be different. Accordingly, the uncertainty of the operating environment must be considered. Moreover, predicting software failures is commonly an important part of study, not only for software developers, but also for companies and research institutes. Software reliability model can measure and predict the number of software failures, software failure intervals, software reliability, and failure rates. In this paper, we propose a new model with an inflection factor of the fault detection rate function, considering the uncertainty of operating environments and analyzing how the predicted value of the proposed new model is different than the other models. We compare the proposed model with several existing NHPP software reliability models using real software failure datasets based on ten criteria. The results show that the proposed new model has significantly better goodness-of-fit and predictability than the other models.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document