Dissipative instability of overlimiting electron beam

The morphology and composition of the fiber-matrix interface can best be studied by transmission electron microscopy and electron diffraction. For some composites satisfactory samples can be prepared by electropolishing. For others such as aluminum alloy-boron composites ion erosion is necessary.When one wishes to examine a specimen with the electron beam perpendicular to the fiber, preparation is as follows: A 1/8 in. disk is cut from the sample with a cylindrical tool by spark machining. Thin slices, 5 mils thick, containing one row of fibers, are then, spark-machined from the disk. After spark machining, the slice is carefully polished with diamond paste until the row of fibers is exposed on each side, as shown in Figure 1.In the case where examination is desired with the electron beam parallel to the fiber, preparation is as follows: Experimental composites are usually 50 mils or less in thickness so an auxiliary holder is necessary during ion milling and for easy transfer to the electron microscope. This holder is pure aluminum sheet, 3 mils thick.

Download Full-text

Temperature Dependence of the Critical Electron Dose for Fatty Acid Monolayers

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100053188 ◽

1982 ◽

Vol 40 ◽

pp. 78-79

Author(s):

Kenneth H. Downing ◽

Robert M. Glaeser

Keyword(s):

Electron Beam ◽

Fatty Acid ◽

Inelastic Scattering ◽

Temperature Dependence ◽

Structural Damage ◽

Direct Result ◽

Second Step ◽

Strong Temperature Dependence ◽

Electron Dose ◽

Covalent Bonds

The structural damage of molecules irradiated by electrons is generally considered to occur in two steps. The direct result of inelastic scattering events is the disruption of covalent bonds. Following changes in bond structure, movement of the constituent atoms produces permanent distortions of the molecules. Since at least the second step should show a strong temperature dependence, it was to be expected that cooling a specimen should extend its lifetime in the electron beam. This result has been found in a large number of experiments, but the degree to which cooling the specimen enhances its resistance to radiation damage has been found to vary widely with specimen types.

Download Full-text

Lithography below 100 nm

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100074367 ◽

1983 ◽

Vol 41 ◽

pp. 96-99

Author(s):

L. D. Jackel

Keyword(s):

Spatial Distribution ◽

Electron Beam ◽

Electron Scattering ◽

Electron Beam Lithography ◽

Substrate Material ◽

Local Electron ◽

Electron Dose ◽

Positive Resist ◽

Exposure Process

Most production electron beam lithography systems can pattern minimum features a few tenths of a micron across. Linewidth in these systems is usually limited by the quality of the exposing beam and by electron scattering in the resist and substrate. By using a smaller spot along with exposure techniques that minimize scattering and its effects, laboratory e-beam lithography systems can now make features hundredths of a micron wide on standard substrate material. This talk will outline sane of these high- resolution e-beam lithography techniques.We first consider parameters of the exposure process that limit resolution in organic resists. For concreteness suppose that we have a “positive” resist in which exposing electrons break bonds in the resist molecules thus increasing the exposed resist's solubility in a developer. Ihe attainable resolution is obviously limited by the overall width of the exposing beam, but the spatial distribution of the beam intensity, the beam “profile” , also contributes to the resolution. Depending on the local electron dose, more or less resist bonds are broken resulting in slower or faster dissolution in the developer.

Download Full-text