Cost-Benefit Analysis of Alternative Ocean Observing Platforms for Coastal Water Quality Monitoring

OCEANS 2006 ◽  
2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Dragos ◽  
Michael Mickelson ◽  
Carl Albro ◽  
Matthew Fitzpatrick
2019 ◽  
Vol 281 ◽  
pp. 03004 ◽  
Author(s):  
François Destandau ◽  
Youssef Zaiter

The Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC draw attention to Water Quality Monitoring Networks (WQMN) that allows the acquisition of information regarding water streams. Information could be acquired by a spatial and/or temporal approach. However, there is a cost for monitoring water quality. Hence, to determine the spatio-temporal design of the network, the Economic Value of Information must be known to undertake a cost-benefit analysis. In this study, we show how the calculation of the EVOI can help the network manager to answer questions such as: is the cost of monitoring justified? How to allocate a budget between adding a monitoring station or increasing the frequency of measurement of existing stations?


Shore & Beach ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 26-35
Author(s):  
Angelos Hannnides ◽  
Nicole Elko ◽  
Tiffany Roberts Briggs ◽  
Sung-Chan Kim ◽  
Annie Mercer ◽  
...  

Coastal water quality is an important factor influencing public health and the quality of our nation’s beaches. In recent years, poor water quality has resulted in increased numbers of beach closures and corresponding negative impacts on tourism. This paper addresses some of the issues surrounding the management challenge of coastal water quality, in particular, beach water quality monitoring. For this effort, data on beach water quality monitoring activities conducted by states were assessed and synthesized. In total, 29 states were surveyed: 16 reported information for seawater; six reported for freshwater only; eight reported for both seawater and freshwater. Thresholds for advisories and closure vary nationally; however, all 29 states have established an online presence for their monitoring programs and display advisories and closures in real time, most often on spatial information (GIS) portals. Challenges in monitoring, prediction, and communication are assessed and discussed. Based on this assessment, the committee offers the following recommendations, as detailed in the text: • Standardization of water quality data and the distribution medium; • Enhanced public access to water quality monitoring data; • Consistent thresholds for swim advisories; • Water quality regulation reviews with stakeholder participation; • Enhanced predictive models incorporating rapid testing results; • Holistic water quality monitoring that includes indicators beyond fecal indicator bacteria; • Managing contaminants of emerging concern through identification, monitoring and control; and • Funding for water quality monitoring and reporting -- from federal, state, and local governments.


2015 ◽  
Vol 116 ◽  
pp. 955-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pravakar Mishra ◽  
Uma Sankar Panda ◽  
Umakanta Pradhan ◽  
C. Saravana Kumar ◽  
Subrat Naik ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 158-174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Hoon Kim ◽  
Jungho Im ◽  
Ho Kyung Ha ◽  
Jong-Kuk Choi ◽  
Sunghyun Ha

IEEE Access ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-1
Author(s):  
N. A. P. Rostam ◽  
N. H. A. H. Malim ◽  
R. Abdullah ◽  
A. L. Ahmad ◽  
B. S. Ooi ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Chad Crain ◽  
Keith Kezer ◽  
Syreeta Steele ◽  
Judith Owiti ◽  
Sphoorthy Rao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document