Detection of simulated microemboli using a diffraction grating ultrasound probe and spectral energy criteria

Proceedings of the IEEE 28th Annual Northeast Bioengineering Conference (IEEE Cat. No.02CH37342) ◽

10.1109/nebc.2002.999516 ◽

2003 ◽

Author(s):

S.G. Ballakur ◽

J. Blebea ◽

S.W. Hazard ◽

R. Zickler ◽

W.J. Weiss

Keyword(s):

Diffraction Grating ◽

Spectral Energy ◽

Ultrasound Probe

Download Full-text

Spectral energy measurements of simulated microemboli of various sizes using a diffraction grating ultrasound probe

10.1117/12.479951 ◽

2003 ◽

Author(s):

William J. Weiss ◽

Sowmya G. Ballakur ◽

Hoang Tran ◽

Sprague W. Hazard ◽

John Blebea

Keyword(s):

Diffraction Grating ◽

Spectral Energy ◽

Ultrasound Probe

Download Full-text

Uniformity of Magnification from Different Electron Microscopes

Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America ◽

10.1017/s0424820100060179 ◽

1967 ◽

Vol 25 ◽

pp. 32-33

Author(s):

Godfrey C. Hoskins ◽

V. Williams ◽

V. Allison

Keyword(s):

Diffraction Grating ◽

The Other ◽

Carbon Replica ◽

Electron Microscopes ◽

The Stability

The method demonstrated is an adaptation of a proven procedure for accurately determining the magnification of light photomicrographs. Because of the stability of modern electrical lenses, the method is shown to be directly applicable for providing precise reproducibility of magnification in various models of electron microscopes.A readily recognizable area of a carbon replica of a crossed-line diffraction grating is used as a standard. The same area of the standard was photographed in Phillips EM 200, Hitachi HU-11B2, and RCA EMU 3F electron microscopes at taps representative of the range of magnification of each. Negatives from one microscope were selected as guides and printed at convenient magnifications; then negatives from each of the other microscopes were projected to register with these prints. By deferring measurement to the print rather than comparing negatives, correspondence of magnification of the specimen in the three microscopes could be brought to within 2%.

Download Full-text

Shadow Theory of Diffraction Grating: Reciprocity, Symmetry and Average Filter

IEICE Transactions on Electronics ◽

10.1587/transele.e97.c.1036 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol E97.C (10) ◽

pp. 1036-1040 ◽

Cited By ~ 8

Author(s):

Junichi NAKAYAMA ◽

Yasuhiko TAMURA

Keyword(s):

Diffraction Grating ◽

Average Filter

Download Full-text

Electrodynamic System for Diffraction Radiation Oscillators with Resonant Matching of Diffraction Grating

Telecommunications and Radio Engineering ◽

10.1615/telecomradeng.v67.i7.30 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 67 (7) ◽

pp. 597-607

Author(s):

M. Yu. Demchenko ◽

V. S. Myroshnychenko ◽

Yu. V. Svishchev ◽

Ye. B. Senkevich

Keyword(s):

Diffraction Grating ◽

Diffraction Radiation ◽

Electrodynamic System

Download Full-text

Case Report: FAST Ultrasound Interpretation in Trauma Resuscitation

POCUS Journal ◽

10.24908/pocus.v1i3.13263 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 1 (3) ◽

pp. 13-14

Author(s):

Stuart Douglas, PGY4 ◽

Joseph Newbigging, MD ◽

David Robertson, MD

Keyword(s):

Case Report ◽

Negative Predictive Value ◽

Predictive Value ◽

Life Support ◽

Advanced Trauma Life Support ◽

Trauma Patients ◽

Ultrasound Probe ◽

Trauma Resuscitation ◽

Highly Sensitive ◽

Pouch Of Douglas

FAST Background: Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) is an integral adjunct to primary survey in trauma patients (1-4) and is incorporated into Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) algorithms (4). A collection of four discrete ultrasound probe examinations (pericardial sac, hepatorenal fossa (Morison’s pouch), splenorenal fossa, and pelvis/pouch of Douglas), it has been shown to be highly sensitive for detection of as little as 100cm3 of intraabdominal fluid (4,5), with a sensitivity quoted between 60-98%, specificity of 84-98%, and negative predictive value of 97-99% (3).

Download Full-text