scholarly journals Researches of college sports technology teaching evaluation methods

Author(s):  
Kaiqiang Guo ◽  
Juan Pu
Author(s):  
Feixiong Ma ◽  
Zichuan Zhu ◽  
Mi Zhou ◽  
Wen-Tsao Pan

At present, some classroom teaching evaluation methods are actually difficult to reasonably and fairly evaluate teachers’ true teaching level and classroom teaching quality. There are many shortcomings and drawbacks. In order to overcome the shortcomings of traditional teaching evaluation and enhance the evaluation effect, this paper combines the current advanced management methods with the merits of traditional evaluation methods, and applies the fuzzy evaluation method to combine qualitative assessment and quantitative assessment. First of all, establish a scientific and reasonable classroom teaching quality assessment index system, determine the standard assessment criteria, and then select and use the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model to evaluate the classroom teaching quality, thus establishing a complete and effective teaching quality evaluation system.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-10
Author(s):  
Bo Wu ◽  
Changlong Zheng

Artificial intelligence was first proposed in the 1950s, when it was only a forward-looking concept. If machines can have the same learning ability as human beings and the computing power of computers themselves, this concept has been placed high hopes. Until about 2010, with the explosion of data volume and the improvement of computer performance, machine learning has become a leader in breaking through the bottleneck of artificial intelligence. Research on machine learning in education and teaching has attracted much attention. From the above research status, we can see that in the current period of the vigorous development of machine learning, many applications are still not perfect and ordinary education and teaching evaluation is difficult to meet people’s requirements, so how to gradually improve its effectiveness is a significant goal with research significance and practical interests. However, in the environment of colleges and universities, prediction information and evaluation methods have important application value and development space in education and teaching. In this context, according to the theory of machine science, the effectiveness of several conventional prediction and evaluation methods is analyzed. In this paper, machine learning theory is used to study college students’ performance prediction and credit evaluation, as well as teaching quality evaluation and comprehensive ability evaluation in colleges and universities. Questionnaire survey is used to investigate and analyze the results. The effectiveness of machine theory in teaching is analyzed. It is found that machine learning has great advantages in education and teaching evaluation. It builds models in complex computing environment and is not affected by human factors; the effectiveness of prediction and evaluation is significant.


1972 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 48-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
RS Kaslick ◽  
A Van Stewart ◽  
AI Chasens
Keyword(s):  

ASHA Leader ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa Luna DeCurtis ◽  
Dawn Ferrer
Keyword(s):  

1972 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel N. Braunstein ◽  
Ralph Schillace ◽  
John Feldhusen ◽  
Ernest McDaniel ◽  
Frederic W. Widlak ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 60-67
Author(s):  
Henrika Pihlajaniemi ◽  
Anna Luusua ◽  
Eveliina Juntunen

This paper presents the evaluation of usersХ experiences in three intelligent lighting pilots in Finland. Two of the case studies are related to the use of intelligent lighting in different kinds of traffic areas, having emphasis on aspects of visibility, traffic and movement safety, and sense of security. The last case study presents a more complex view to the experience of intelligent lighting in smart city contexts. The evaluation methods, tailored to each pilot context, include questionnaires, an urban dashboard, in-situ interviews and observations, evaluation probes, and system data analyses. The applicability of the selected and tested methods is discussed reflecting the process and achieved results.


2006 ◽  
Vol 126 (12) ◽  
pp. 1722-1729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akeshi Takahashi ◽  
Haruo Koharagi ◽  
Satoshi Kikuchi ◽  
Kazumasa Ide ◽  
Kazuo Shima

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document