Recommended Surveillance and Action Requirements for Large Lead Storage Batteries at Nuclear Power Generating Stations Prepared by the IEEE Working Group on Batteries Station Design Subcommittee, Power Generation Committee

1981 ◽  
Vol PER-1 (11) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Working Group ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Storage Batteries

Exploring the perception of Nigerians towards nuclear power generation

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-12
Author(s):  
Daniel R. E. Ewim ◽  
Stephen S. Oyewobi ◽  
Michael O. Dioha ◽  
Chibuike E. Daraojimba ◽  
Suzzie O. Oyakhire ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Nuclear Power Generation

Safety Justification Strategy for the Implementation of Additive Manufacture Small-Bore Globe Valves for Nuclear Plant

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bill Press ◽  
Adam Dukes ◽  
Dave Poole ◽  
Jack Adams ◽  
Luke Burling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Performance Testing ◽  
Nuclear Plant ◽  
Raw Material ◽  
Additive Manufacture ◽  
Lead Times ◽  
Materials Testing ◽  
Thermal Tests ◽  
Pressure Testing

Abstract The Additive Manufacture (AM) of nuclear plant components, such as small-bore globe valves, offers opportunities to reduce costs and improve production lead-times. Cost reductions can be achieved by reducing raw material quantities, removing machining operations, and eliminating the welding of sub-assemblies. Furthermore, there is the opportunity to reduce production lead-times by simplifying the supply chain, e.g. reducing the number of parts to be sourced and eliminating special operations. Such opportunities are important against a backdrop of industry striving to reduce the cost of nuclear power generation in order to ensure viability with other forms of power generation. However, AM is a relatively new and innovative manufacturing technology, and although now seeing greater use in industry, there are still very few examples of where the technology has been applied to components used in safety critical applications. Furthermore, it is not covered by the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME), Section III, nuclear design code. For nuclear plant applications, it is imperative a robust safety justification is provided. This paper presents Rolls-Royce’s approach to provision of a high integrity safety justification to enable the implementation of AM small-bore globe valves, up to a nominal bore size of 2” to nuclear plant. The material of construction is AM Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) 316LN stainless steel, with a Hot Isostatic Press (HIP) bonded LPBF Tristelle 5183 low cobalt hard facing seat. The paper describes the structure of the safety justification, which follows a multi-legged approach. It provides an overview of the innovative manufacturing process, which is, to the best of Rolls-Royce’s knowledge, the first of a kind application on nuclear pressure boundary components. The paper provides a summary of the suite of materials testing and metallurgical examinations conducted, and majors on prototype functional and performance testing where comparisons are made with the previous forged form. Pressure testing is covered which includes ultimate pressure testing to 2,000 bar, as well as: functional cyclic testing, hard facing bond strength tests, dynamic loading (shock), and cyclic thermal tests. In all cases the additive manufactured small-bore globe valves performed as well, and in some cases better than the forged material equivalent.

scholarly journals French Energy Sector in Search for Optimal Model

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (5) ◽  
pp. 156-171
Author(s):  
A. V. Zimakov
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Nuclear Reactors ◽  
Current Model ◽  
Energy Transition ◽  
Clean Energy ◽  
Green Energy ◽  
Electricity Production ◽  
Low Carbon ◽  
The Eu

Clean energy transition is one of major transformation processes in the EU. There are different approaches among EU countries to decarbonization of their energy systems. The article deals with clean energy transition in France with the emphasis on power generation. While this transformation process is in line with similar developments in the EU, the Franch case has its distinct nature due to nuclear power domination in electricity production there. It represents a challenge for the current model as the transition is linked to a sharp drop of nuclear share in the power mix. It is important to understand the trajectory of further clean energy transition in France and its ultimate model. The article reviews the historical roots of the current model (which stems from Messmer plan of the 1970-es) and its development over years, as well as assesses its drawbacks and merits in order to outline possible future prospects. The conclusion is that the desired reduction of nuclear energy is linked not solely to greening process but has a complex of reasons, the ageing of nuclear reactors being one of them. Nuclear power remains an important low-carbon technology allowing France to achieve carbon neutrality by 2050. A desired future energy model in France can be understood based on the analysis of new legislation and government action plans. The targeted model is expected to balance of nuclear and green energy in the generation mix in 50% to 40% proportion by 2035, with the rest left to gas power generation. Being pragmatic, French government aims at partial nuclear reactors shut down provided that this will not lead to the rise of GHG emissions, energy market distortions, or electricity price hikes. The balanced French model is believed to be a softer and socially comfortable option of low-carbon model.

scholarly journals Nuclear Power: Time to Start Again

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Rezak
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Electric Power ◽  
Nuclear Power ◽  
Power Plants ◽  
Nuclear Power Plants ◽  
Environmentally Friendly ◽  
Power Industry ◽  
Nuclear Industry ◽  
The Us ◽  
Generating Capacity

One of America’s best kept secrets is the success of its nuclear electric power industry. This paper presents data which support the construction and operating successes enjoyed by energy companies that operate nuclear power plants in the US. The result—the US nuclear industry is alive and well. Perhaps it’s time to start anew the building of nuclear power plants. Let’s take the wraps off the major successes achieved in the nuclear power industry. Over 20% of the electricity generated in the United States comes from nuclear power plants. An adequate, reliable supply of reasonably priced electric energy is not a consequence of an expanding economy and gross national product; it is an absolute necessity before such expansion can occur. It is hard to imagine any aspect of our business or personal lives not, in some way, dependent upon electricity. All over the world (in 34 countries) nuclear power is a low-cost, secure, safe, dependable, and environmentally friendly form of electric power generation. Nuclear plants in these countries are built in six to eight years using technology developed in the US, with good performance and safety records. This treatise addresses the success experienced by the US nuclear industry over the last 40 years, and makes the case that this reliable, cost-competitive source of electric power can help support the economic engine of the country and help prevent experiences like the recent crisis in California. Traditionally, the evaluation of electric power generation facility performance has focused on the ability of plants to produce at design capacity for high percentages of the time. Successful operation of nuclear facilities is determined by examining capacity or load factors. Load factor is the percentage of design generating capacity that a power plant actually produces over the course of a year’s operation. This paper makes the case that these operating performance indicators warrant renewed consideration of the nuclear option. Usage of electricity in the US now approaches total generating capacity. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has pre-approved construction and operating licenses for several nuclear plant designs. State public service commissions are beginning to understand that dramatic reform is required. The economy is recovering and inflation is minimal. It’s time, once more, to turn to the safe, reliable, environmentally friendly nuclear power alternative.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document