A New Paradigm of Electronic Health Record for Efficient Implementation of Health Care Delivery

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Kumar Kannoju ◽  
K. V. Sridhar ◽  
K. S. R. Prasad
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Care Delivery ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Efficient Implementation ◽  
Health Record ◽  
New Paradigm ◽  
Electronic Health

scholarly journals The Perceptions of and Factors Associated With the Adoption of the Electronic Health Record Sharing System Among Patients and Physicians: Cross-Sectional Survey (Preprint)

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin CS Wong ◽  
Junjie Huang ◽  
Paul SF Chan ◽  
Veeleah Lok ◽  
Colette Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Health Care Service ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Electronic Health

BACKGROUND The electronic health record sharing system (eHRSS) was implemented as a new health care delivery platform to facilitate two-way communication between the public and private sectors in Hong Kong. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of and factors associated with the adoption of eHRSS among patients, the general public, and private physicians. METHODS Telephone interviews were conducted in 2018 by using a simple random sampling strategy from a list of patients who had enrolled in the eHRSS and a territory-wide telephone directory for nonenrolled residents. We completed 2000 surveys (1000 each for enrolled and nonenrolled individuals). Private physicians completed self-administered questionnaires, including 762 valid questionnaires from 454 enrolled physicians and 308 nonenrolled physicians. RESULTS Most participants (707/1000, 70.70%) were satisfied with the overall performance of the eHRSS. Regarding registration status, most nonenrolled patients (647/1000, 64.70%) reported that “no recommendation from their physicians and family members” was the major barrier, whereas more than half of the physicians (536/1000, 53.60%) expressed concerns on “additional workload due to use of eHRSS.” A multivariate regression analysis showed that patients were more likely to register when they reported “other service providers could view the medical records” (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.09, 95% CI 4.87-7.63; <i>P</i>&lt;.001) and “friends’ or family’s recommendation or assistance in registration” (aOR 3.51, 95% CI 2.04-6.03; <i>P</i>=.001). Physicians were more likely to register when they believed that the eHRSS could improve the quality of health care service (aOR 4.70, 95% CI 1.77-12.51; <i>P</i>=.002) and were aware that the eHRSS could reduce duplicated tests and treatments (aOR 4.16, 95% CI 1.73-9.97; <i>P</i>=.001). CONCLUSIONS Increasing the possibility of viewing patients' personal medical record, expanding the sharable data scope for patients, and highlighting the benefits of the system for physicians could be effective to enhance the adoption of the eHRSS.

Naming Notes: Transitions from Free Text to Structured Entry

1995 ◽  
Vol 34 (01/02) ◽  
pp. 57-67 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Gregory ◽  
J. E. Mattison ◽  
C. Linde
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Free Text ◽  
Development Effort ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract:To practice medicine in the near future, health care providers in the USA need an information infrastructure they do not yet have. We offer a contribution from social science research to discussions of current medical records practices and how health care activity systems may be transformed by the advent of electronic health records. The goal of the paper is to set forth a framework that connects over-arching questions concerning medical informatics systems development with the practical, cultural and conceptual issues involved in transitions from handwritten and other free text documentation to structured entry of medical records to build patient profiles. The research is broadly framed by an interest in how reciprocal modifications of the design and use of an electronic health record are negotiated in an iterative prototyping project. It is conducted as part of a complex multi-disciplinary research and development effort to create an electronic health record prototype for use in the integrated health care delivery environment of the Southern California Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program.

scholarly journals The Perceptions of and Factors Associated With the Adoption of the Electronic Health Record Sharing System Among Patients and Physicians: Cross-Sectional Survey

10.2196/17452 ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. e17452
Author(s):  
Martin CS Wong ◽  
Junjie Huang ◽  
Paul SF Chan ◽  
Veeleah Lok ◽  
Colette Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Service Providers ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Health Care Service ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Public And Private ◽  
Major Barrier ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Electronic Health

Background The electronic health record sharing system (eHRSS) was implemented as a new health care delivery platform to facilitate two-way communication between the public and private sectors in Hong Kong. Objective This study aimed to investigate the perceptions of and factors associated with the adoption of eHRSS among patients, the general public, and private physicians. Methods Telephone interviews were conducted in 2018 by using a simple random sampling strategy from a list of patients who had enrolled in the eHRSS and a territory-wide telephone directory for nonenrolled residents. We completed 2000 surveys (1000 each for enrolled and nonenrolled individuals). Private physicians completed self-administered questionnaires, including 762 valid questionnaires from 454 enrolled physicians and 308 nonenrolled physicians. Results Most participants (707/1000, 70.70%) were satisfied with the overall performance of the eHRSS. Regarding registration status, most nonenrolled patients (647/1000, 64.70%) reported that “no recommendation from their physicians and family members” was the major barrier, whereas more than half of the physicians (536/1000, 53.60%) expressed concerns on “additional workload due to use of eHRSS.” A multivariate regression analysis showed that patients were more likely to register when they reported “other service providers could view the medical records” (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 6.09, 95% CI 4.87-7.63; P<.001) and “friends’ or family’s recommendation or assistance in registration” (aOR 3.51, 95% CI 2.04-6.03; P=.001). Physicians were more likely to register when they believed that the eHRSS could improve the quality of health care service (aOR 4.70, 95% CI 1.77-12.51; P=.002) and were aware that the eHRSS could reduce duplicated tests and treatments (aOR 4.16, 95% CI 1.73-9.97; P=.001). Conclusions Increasing the possibility of viewing patients' personal medical record, expanding the sharable data scope for patients, and highlighting the benefits of the system for physicians could be effective to enhance the adoption of the eHRSS.

scholarly journals Transitions from One Electronic Health Record to Another: Challenges, Pitfalls, and Recommendations

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (05) ◽  
pp. 742-754
Author(s):  
Chunya Huang ◽  
Ross Koppel ◽  
John D. McGreevey ◽  
Catherine K. Craven ◽  
Richard Schreiber
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Patient Safety ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Mesh Term ◽  
Unintended Consequences ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Medical Subject Headings ◽  
Extensive Experience ◽  
Electronic Health

Abstract Objective We address the challenges of transitioning from one electronic health record (EHR) to another—a near ubiquitous phenomenon in health care. We offer mitigating strategies to reduce unintended consequences, maximize patient safety, and enhance health care delivery. Methods We searched PubMed and other sources to identify articles describing EHR-to-EHR transitions. We combined these references with the authors' extensive experience to construct a conceptual schema and to offer recommendations to facilitate transitions. Results Our PubMed query retrieved 1,351 citations: 43 were relevant for full paper review and 18 met the inclusion criterion of focus on EHR-to-EHR transitions. An additional PubMed search yielded 1,014 citations, for which we reviewed 74 full papers and included 5. We supplemented with additional citations for a total of 70 cited. We distinguished 10 domains in the literature that overlap yet present unique and salient opportunities for successful transitions and for problem mitigation. Discussion There is scant literature concerning EHR-to-EHR transitions. Identified challenges include financial burdens, personnel resources, patient safety threats from limited access to legacy records, data integrity during migration, cybersecurity, and semantic interoperability. Transition teams must overcome inadequate human infrastructure, technical challenges, security gaps, unrealistic providers' expectations, workflow changes, and insufficient training and support—all factors affecting potential clinician burnout. Conclusion EHR transitions are remarkably expensive, laborious, personnel devouring, and time consuming. The paucity of references in comparison to the topic's salience reinforces the necessity for this type of review and analysis. Prudent planning may streamline EHR transitions and reduce expenses. Mitigating strategies, such as preservation of legacy data, managing expectations, and hiring short-term specialty consultants can overcome some of the greatest hurdles. A new medical subject headings (MeSH) term for EHR transitions would facilitate further research on this topic.

Business: The Electronic Health Record: Front Line Experience

2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 18-22
Author(s):  
Rosemary Griffin
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Information Technology ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Health Care Systems ◽  
The United States ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Health Trends ◽  
Electronic Health

National legislation is in place to facilitate reform of the United States health care industry. The Health Care Information Technology and Clinical Health Act (HITECH) offers financial incentives to hospitals, physicians, and individual providers to establish an electronic health record that ultimately will link with the health information technology of other health care systems and providers. The information collected will facilitate patient safety, promote best practice, and track health trends such as smoking and childhood obesity.

scholarly journals Electronic Health Record Acceptance by Physicians: A Single Hospital Experience in Daily Practice

2021 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-17
Author(s):  
Andrija Pavlovic ◽  
Nina Rajovic ◽  
Jasmina Pavlovic Stojanovic ◽  
Debora Akinyombo ◽  
Milica Ugljesic ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Logistic Regression ◽  
Electronic Health Record ◽  
Technology Acceptance ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Ease Of Use ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Health Record ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Electronic Health

Introduction: Potential benefits of implementing an electronic health record (EHR) to increase the efficiency of health services and improve the quality of health care are often obstructed by the unwillingness of the users themselves to accept and use the available systems. Aim: The aim of this study was to identify factors that influence the acceptance of the use of an EHR by physicians in the daily practice of hospital health care. Material and Methods: The cross-sectional study was conducted among physicians in the General Hospital Pancevo, Serbia. An anonymous questionnaire, developed according to the technology acceptance model (TAM), was used for the assessment of EHR acceptance. The response rate was 91%. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach’s alpha coefficient. A logistic regression analysis was used to identify the factors influencing the acceptance of the use of EHR. Results: The study population included 156 physicians. The mean age was 46.4 ± 10.4 years, 58.8% participants were female. Half of the respondents (50.1%) supported the use of EHR in comparison to paper patient records. In multivariate logistic regression modeling of social and technical factors, ease of use, usefulness, and attitudes towards use of EHR as determinants of the EHR acceptance, the following predictors were identified: use of a computer outside of the office for reading daily newspapers (p = 0.005), EHR providing a greater amount of valuable information (p = 0.007), improvement in the productivity by EHR use (p < 0.001), and a statement that using EHR is a good idea (p = 0.014). Overall the percentage of correct classifications in the model was 83.9%. Conclusion: In this research, determinants of the EHR acceptance were assessed in accordance with the TAM, providing an overall good model fit. Future research should attempt to add other constructs to the TAM in order to fully identify all determinants of physician acceptance of EHR in the complex environment of different health systems.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document