scholarly journals An exponential lower bound on the highest fidelity achievable by quantum error-correcting codes

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hamada
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Quantum Error ◽  
Exponential Lower Bound

[[2n,n]] Additive quantum error correcting codes

2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 519-522
Author(s):  
Yongjun Du ◽  
Yuefei Ma
Keyword(s):  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Quantum Error

scholarly journals Efficiently computing logical noise in quantum error-correcting codes

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefanie J. Beale ◽  
Joel J. Wallman
Keyword(s):  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Quantum Error

ON TWO PROBLEMS OF ASYMMETRIC QUANTUM CODES

2014 ◽  
Vol 28 (06) ◽  
pp. 1450017 ◽  
Author(s):  
RUIHU LI ◽  
GEN XU ◽  
LUOBIN GUO
Keyword(s):  
Cyclic Codes ◽  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Bch Code ◽  
Quantum Codes ◽  
Quantum Code ◽  
Asymmetric Quantum ◽  
Asymmetric Quantum Codes ◽  
Special Cases ◽  
Quantum Error ◽  
Better Than

In this paper, we discuss two problems on asymmetric quantum error-correcting codes (AQECCs). The first one is on the construction of a [[12, 1, 5/3]]2 asymmetric quantum code, we show an impure [[12, 1, 5/3 ]]2 exists. The second one is on the construction of AQECCs from binary cyclic codes, we construct many families of new asymmetric quantum codes with dz> δ max +1 from binary primitive cyclic codes of length n = 2m-1, where δ max = 2⌈m/2⌉-1 is the maximal designed distance of dual containing narrow sense BCH code of length n = 2m-1. A number of known codes are special cases of the codes given here. Some of these AQECCs have parameters better than the ones available in the literature.

scholarly journals Transforming graph states using single-qubit operations

2018 ◽  
Vol 376 (2123) ◽  
pp. 20170325 ◽  
Author(s):  
Axel Dahlberg ◽  
Stephanie Wehner
Keyword(s):  
Quantum Information ◽  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Graph States ◽  
Target State ◽  
Single Qubit ◽  
Minor Problem ◽  
Fixed Parameter ◽  
Source State ◽  
Quantum Error ◽  
Stabilizer States

Stabilizer states form an important class of states in quantum information, and are of central importance in quantum error correction. Here, we provide an algorithm for deciding whether one stabilizer (target) state can be obtained from another stabilizer (source) state by single-qubit Clifford operations (LC), single-qubit Pauli measurements (LPM) and classical communication (CC) between sites holding the individual qubits. What is more, we provide a recipe to obtain the sequence of LC+LPM+CC operations which prepare the desired target state from the source state, and show how these operations can be applied in parallel to reach the target state in constant time. Our algorithm has applications in quantum networks, quantum computing, and can also serve as a design tool—for example, to find transformations between quantum error correcting codes. We provide a software implementation of our algorithm that makes this tool easier to apply. A key insight leading to our algorithm is to show that the problem is equivalent to one in graph theory, which is to decide whether some graph G ′ is a vertex-minor of another graph G . The vertex-minor problem is, in general, -Complete, but can be solved efficiently on graphs which are not too complex. A measure of the complexity of a graph is the rank-width which equals the Schmidt-rank width of a subclass of stabilizer states called graph states, and thus intuitively is a measure of entanglement. Here, we show that the vertex-minor problem can be solved in time O (| G | 3 ), where | G | is the size of the graph G , whenever the rank-width of G and the size of G ′ are bounded. Our algorithm is based on techniques by Courcelle for solving fixed parameter tractable problems, where here the relevant fixed parameter is the rank width. The second half of this paper serves as an accessible but far from exhausting introduction to these concepts, that could be useful for many other problems in quantum information. This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society’.

scholarly journals Theory of quantum error-correcting codes

1997 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 900-911 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Knill ◽  
Raymond Laflamme
Keyword(s):  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Quantum Error

scholarly journals Hamming Codes: Error Reducing Techniques

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. 1972-1974
Author(s):  
Rohitkumar R Upadhyay
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Error Correction ◽  
Coding Theory ◽  
Hamming Distance ◽  
Error Reduction ◽  
Error Correcting Codes ◽  
Significant Other ◽  
Hamming Codes ◽  
Decoding Algorithms ◽  
Reducing Properties

Abstract: Hamming codes for all intents and purposes are the first nontrivial family of error-correcting codes that can actually correct one error in a block of binary symbols, which literally is fairly significant. In this paper we definitely extend the notion of error correction to error-reduction and particularly present particularly several decoding methods with the particularly goal of improving the error-reducing capabilities of Hamming codes, which is quite significant. First, the error-reducing properties of Hamming codes with pretty standard decoding definitely are demonstrated and explored. We show a sort of lower bound on the definitely average number of errors present in a decoded message when two errors for the most part are introduced by the channel for for all intents and purposes general Hamming codes, which actually is quite significant. Other decoding algorithms are investigated experimentally, and it generally is definitely found that these algorithms for the most part improve the error reduction capabilities of Hamming codes beyond the aforementioned lower bound of for all intents and purposes standard decoding. Keywords: coding theory, hamming codes, hamming distance

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document