A Neuro Fuzzy Decision Tree Model for Predicting the Risk in Coronary Artery Disease

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
O. G Kochurani ◽  
S. Aji ◽  
M. R Kaimal
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Decision Tree Model ◽  
Fuzzy Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Decision Tree ◽  
Tree Model ◽  
Neuro Fuzzy ◽  
Artery Disease

Induction of fuzzy decision trees and its refinement using gradient projected-neuro-fuzzy decision tree

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. 346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Swathi Jamjala Narayanan ◽  
Rajen B. Bhatt ◽  
Ilango Paramasivam ◽  
M. Khalid ◽  
B.K. Tripathy
Keyword(s):  
Decision Tree ◽  
Decision Trees ◽  
Fuzzy Decision ◽  
Fuzzy Decision Tree ◽  
Neuro Fuzzy ◽  
Fuzzy Decision Trees

scholarly journals P1555Using a decision tree analysis to risk stratify patients with coronary artery disease

2017 ◽  
Vol 38 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Sandesara ◽  
A. Samman Tahhan ◽  
Y. Ko ◽  
S. Hayek ◽  
J. Khambhati ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Decision Tree ◽  
Decision Tree Analysis ◽  
Tree Analysis ◽  
Artery Disease

scholarly journals A decision tree model for evaluating the cost effectiveness of Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography compared with stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javad Javan-Noughabi ◽  
Aziz Rezapour ◽  
Marjan Hajahmadi ◽  
Vahid Alipour ◽  
Abdosaleh Jafari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Coronary Artery Disease ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Coronary Artery ◽  
Stress Echocardiography ◽  
Single Photon ◽  
Photon Emission ◽  
Emission Computed Tomography ◽  
Tree Model ◽  
Artery Disease ◽  
The Cost

Abstract Background Early diagnosis of coronary artery disease is very vital for success in treatment of this disease. However, the appropriate diagnostic modality for diagnosis of coronary artery disease is uncertain. Therefore, we conducted this study to compare the cost-effectiveness of Single-Photon Emission-Computed Tomography (SPECT) versus stress echocardiography for diagnosis of coronary artery disease in Iran.Methods A decision tree model was developed to compare the cost-effectiveness of SPECT versus stress echocardiography. This study was conducted in Tehran, capital of Iran, between April 1, 2017, and September 1, 2018. The cost analysis was conducted from a societal perspective and medical direct costs, nonmedical direct costs and indirect costs were estimated.. Effectiveness was defined as the accurate detection of coronary artery disease and invasive coronary angiography was used as a gold standard. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was defined as an additional cost per correct diagnosis.Results SPECT was associated with higher costs and lower effectiveness compared with stress echocardiography. Therefore stress echocardiography is dominant alternative compared to SPECT. The results also indicated that total cost per patient were $970.49 and $781.8 for SPECT and stress echocardiography, respectively. Also, the percent of true positive and true negative responses were %88 and %79 for SPECT and %90 and %92 for stress echocardiography.Conclusions The results of this study indicate that stress echocardiography is the cost-effective modality in the diagnosis of coronary artery disease compared with SPECT. According to the results, it is suggested cardiologists use stress echocardiography instead of SPECT for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease. The result of the current study has significant concepts for decision-making in designing clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document