Equivalent Simple-Inductive-Circuit and Its Applications of Inner Intrinsically Safe Buck Converter

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shu-Lin Liu ◽  
Yue-Yun Han ◽  
Li-Li Qi
Keyword(s):  
Buck Converter ◽  
Inductive Circuit

STABILISASI TEGANGAN KELUARAN BUCK CONVERTER DENGAN METODE FUZZY LOGIC CONTROLLER

JURNAL ELTEK ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 125
Author(s):  
Oktriza Melfazen
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Steady State ◽  
Rise Time ◽  
Fuzzy Logic Controller ◽  
Buck Converter ◽  
Settling Time

Buck converter idealnya mempunyai keluaran yang stabil, pemanfaatandaya rendah, mudah untuk diatur, antarmuka yang mudah dengan pirantiyang lain, ketahanan yang lebih tinggi terhadap perubahan kondisi alam.Beberapa teknik dikembangkan untuk memenuhi parameter buckconverter. Solusi paling logis untuk digunakan pada sistem ini adalahmetode kontrol digital.Penelitian ini menelaah uji performansi terhadap stabilitas tegangankeluaran buck converter yang dikontrol dengan Logika Fuzzy metodeMamdani. Rangkaian sistem terdiri dari sumber tegangan DC variable,sensor tegangan dan Buck Converter dengan beban resistif sebagaimasukan, mikrokontroler ATMega 8535 sebagai subsistem kontroldengan metode logika fuzzy dan LCD sebagai penampil keluaran.Dengan fungsi keanggotaan error, delta error dan keanggotaan keluaranmasing-masing sebanyak 5 bagian serta metode defuzzifikasi center ofgrafity (COG), didapat hasil rerata error 0,29% pada variable masukan18V–20V dan setpoint keluaran 15V, rise time (tr) = 0,14s ; settling time(ts) = 3,4s ; maximum over shoot (%OS) = 2,6 dan error steady state(ess) = 0,3.

A Study on Loop Gain Measurement Method Using Output Impedance in DC-DC Buck Converter

2018 ◽  
Vol E101.B (9) ◽  
pp. 1940-1948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobukazu TSUKIJI ◽  
Yasunori KOBORI ◽  
Haruo KOBAYASHI
Keyword(s):  
Measurement Method ◽  
Buck Converter ◽  
Loop Gain ◽  
Output Impedance ◽  
Gain Measurement

Comparison between Seven MPPT Techniques Implemented in a Buck Converter

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 476-486
Author(s):  
Lahcen El Mentaly ◽  
Abdellah Amghar ◽  
Hassan Sahsah
Keyword(s):  
Value Added ◽  
Buck Converter ◽  
Maximum Power ◽  
Solar Irradiation ◽  
Solar Panels ◽  
Maximum Power Point ◽  
Point Tracking ◽  
Pv Panel ◽  
Low Efficiency ◽  
Power Point

Background: The solar field on our planet is inexhaustible, which favors the use of photovoltaic electricity which generates no nuisance: no greenhouse gases, no waste. Methods: It is a high value-added energy that is produced directly at the place of consumption through photovoltaic (PV) solar panels. Notwithstanding these advantages, the maximum power depends strongly on solar irradiation and temperature, which means that a Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) controller must be inserted between the PV panel and the load in order to follow the Maximum Power Point (MPP) continuously and in real time. In this work, MPP’s behavior was simulated at different temperatures and solar irradiations using seven techniques which identify the MPP by different methods. Results: The novelty of this work is that the seven MPPT methods were compared according to a very selective criterion which is the MPPT efficiency as well as a purely digital duty cycle control without using the PI controller. The simulation under the PSIM software shows that the FLC, TP, FSCC, TG, HC and IC methods have almost the same efficiency of 99%, whereas the FOCV method had a low efficiency of 96%. Conclusion: This makes it possible to conclude that the best methods are FLC, HC and IC because they use fewer sensors compared to the rest.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document