A Tool-Supported Method for Effective Software Development Process Management

Author(s):  
Jyhjong Lin ◽  
Chaoyu Lin ◽  
Weipang Yang
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Karouw

AbstractDormitory Management Web-based applications is the efficient solution for optimizing Rental Homes business process management. Customers easily get the latest information about the services provided in real-time. Owner may perform supervisory control online, which is expected to increase revenue significantly. Unified Software Development Process (USDP) methodology is a software development famework which supports use-case-driven characteristic and iterative increments, with using UML ver 2.0 as modeling tools. USDP can be used to develop software with object-oriented paradigm by actively involving all stakeholders. USDP also support business processes optimization and shorten application developmentKeywords: Applications Software, Object Oriented, USDP, UML, Software DevelopmentAbstrakAplikasi Dormitory Management berbasis Web adalah solusi efisien untuk mengoptimalkan proses bisnis pengelolaan Rumah Sewa. Pelanggan dapat dengan mudah mendapatkan informasi terkini tentang layanan yang diberikan secara real-time. Owner dapat melakukan kontrol pengawasan secara online. Sehingga diharapkan dapat meningkatkan pendapatan secara signifikan. Metode Unified Software Development Process (USDP) merupakan metode pengembangan perangkat lunak yang use-case driven dan increment-iterative, dengan perangkat UML ver 2.0 untuk keperluan pemodelan. USDP dapat digunakan untuk mengembangkan perangkat lunak yang dibangun dengan paradigma berorientasi obyek dengan melibatkan semua stakeholders secara aktif. Karakteristik metode USDP yang usecase driven, increment-iterative ini dapat memfokuskan pengembangan perangkat lunak pada fungsionalitas aplikasi, sehingga dapat mendukung optimalisasi proses bisnis dan mempersingkat waktu pengembangan aplikasi.Kata Kunci: Aplikasi, Berorientasi Obyek, USDP, UML, Pengembangan Piranti Lunak


2014 ◽  
Vol 989-994 ◽  
pp. 4441-4446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Lan Xu ◽  
Ya Wang

Software Crowdsourcing development model shows the increasingly strong advantage in solving the development of ultra large scale system, mode of development of this new software development process chang to mass, openness and community. At the same time, Software Crowdsourcing development process also reflects the strong competitive, crowdsourcing software development mode is a periodical process of releasing requirement-bidding competition-software review.In order to promote the community members to collaborate, compete and develop, and to improve the software development efficiency and quality,This paper discusses the group in the process of Software Crowdsourcing development, reward and remuneration of reputation and ranking, corporate governance.thus,we can Improve process management, improve the quality and efficiency of software development.


Sensors ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3480
Author(s):  
Walter Takashi Nakamura ◽  
Iftekhar Ahmed ◽  
David Redmiles ◽  
Edson Oliveira ◽  
David Fernandes ◽  
...  

The success of a software application is related to users’ willingness to keep using it. In this sense, evaluating User eXperience (UX) became an important part of the software development process. Researchers have been carrying out studies by employing various methods to evaluate the UX of software products. Some studies reported varied and even contradictory results when applying different UX evaluation methods, making it difficult for practitioners to identify which results to rely upon. However, these works did not evaluate the developers’ perspectives and their impacts on the decision process. Moreover, such studies focused on one-shot evaluations, which cannot assess whether the methods provide the same big picture of the experience (i.e., deteriorating, improving, or stable). This paper presents a longitudinal study in which 68 students evaluated the UX of an online judge system by employing AttrakDiff, UEQ, and Sentence Completion methods at three moments along a semester. This study reveals contrasting results between the methods, which affected developers’ decisions and interpretations. With this work, we intend to draw the HCI community’s attention to the contrast between different UX evaluation methods and the impact of their outcomes in the software development process.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document