Managing reusable learning objects and experience reports in EduSE portal

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Santos ◽  
Claudia Werner ◽  
Heitor Costa ◽  
Ramon Abilio ◽  
Hudson Borges
Keyword(s):  
Learning Objects ◽  
Reusable Learning Objects

scholarly journals Reusable Learning Objects in Health Care Education

2010 ◽  
pp. 244-259 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard Windle ◽  
Heather Wharrad
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Learning Objects ◽  
Health Care Education ◽  
Interprofessional Learning ◽  
Care Education ◽  
Reusable Learning Objects

This chapter will review the definition, development and characteristics of reusable learning objects (RLOs) and outline examples of how these resources are meeting the challenges of interprofessional learning. It will discuss the ways in which pedagogy is developed and expressed within RLOs and how this may impact on interprofessionality.

Development of intelligent reusable learning objects for web-based education systems

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 273-283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rubén Peredo Valderrama ◽  
Leandro Balladares Ocaña ◽  
Leonid B. Sheremetov
Keyword(s):  
Learning Objects ◽  
Education Systems ◽  
Web Based ◽  
Reusable Learning Objects ◽  
Web Based Education

Rethinking Reusability

2013 ◽  
pp. 129-138
Author(s):  
Sandra Wills
Keyword(s):  
Higher Education ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Role Play ◽  
Learning Objects ◽  
Reusable Learning Objects ◽  
History Of

This chapter provides the results of a study that tracked the use of fifty-three online role-plays in Australian higher education over the period 1990–2006, calculating that forty-five of these were a reuse of another role-play. Most reused the design of another role-play (82%) whereas only a handful reused a role-play itself (18%) which confirms the relevance of learning designs as a reusability construct but raises concerns about learning objects. The instances of reuse of the same role-play involved four role-plays which were analyzed in more detail. This fuller history of reuse post-2006 provided a rich sample for: Exploring issues around what is meant by “reuse,” describing factors that could improve the design of reusable learning objects (RLOs). The implications from this study apply in particular to RLOs that involve active, authentic and collaborative learning such as online role-plays.

Learning in the Digital Age with Meaning Equivalence Reusable Learning Objects (MERLO)

2016 ◽  
pp. 310-333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masha Etkind ◽  
Ron S. Kenett ◽  
Uri Shafrir
Keyword(s):  
Common Good ◽  
Evolutionary Dynamics ◽  
Higher Order Thinking ◽  
Learning Objects ◽  
Higher Order ◽  
Attentional Processing ◽  
Reusable Learning Objects ◽  
Information Research ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Meaning Equivalence

In this chapter we describe a novel pedagogy for conceptual thinking and peer cooperation with Meaning Equivalence Reusable Learning Objects (MERLO) that enhances higher-order thinking; deepen comprehension of conceptual content; and improves learning outcomes. The evolution of this instructional methodology follows insights from four recent developments: analysis of patterns of content and structure of labeled patterns in human experience, that led to the emergence of concept science; development of digital cyber-infrastructure of networked information; research in neuroscience and brain imaging, showing that exposure of learners to multi-semiotic inductive problems enhance cognitive control of inter-hemispheric attentional processing in the lateral brain, and increase higher-order thinking; research in evolutionary dynamics on peer cooperation and indirect reciprocity, that document the motivational effect of knowledge of being observed, a psychological imperative that motivate individuals to cooperate and to contribute to the common good.

scholarly journals Quality Assurance for Reusable Learning Objects on a Peer-To-Peer Network

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajendra G. Singh ◽  
Margaret A. Bernard
Keyword(s):  
Subject Matter ◽  
Learning Objects ◽  
Peer To Peer ◽  
P2p Network ◽  
Subject Matter Experts ◽  
Reusable Learning Objects ◽  
Peer Network ◽  
First Time ◽  
Peer To Peer Network

In this research, improving on the quality of Reusable Learning Objects (RLOs) on a Peer-To-Peer (P2P) network is considered. The RLO was first redesigned to have a fundamentally inherent pedagogical structure, which gave it an immediate foundational level of quality in terms of opportunities related to reusability. Applying the Learning Object Review Instrument 1.5 (LORI 1.5) demonstrated that some of the elements are inherent in this new RLO design, so there was no need to constantly have such features evaluated with LORI. A modified LORI was therefore developed in order to evaluate the remaining features of the RLO. The research identified these remaining elements to produce a Review Rubric for scoring the RLO’s quality. In addition, an algorithm is given which considers one or more subject-matter experts as part of a review process. Utilizing the subject-matter experts in a P2P network involved the creation of special nodes to ensure data integrity and post-availability of the review scores for RLOs. The research concludes that the redesigned RLOs along with the corresponding Review Rubric and scoring algorithm produces a system suitable for a P2P network, where for the first time, RLOs can be shared of assured quality to promote eLearning within P2P networks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document