Network Neutrality Principle as a Regulatory Tool: Implications for Crime Prevention and Criminal Law Enforcement

The article is devoted to legislative and law enforcement problems of sentencing minors as special subjects of criminal law relations. In this aspect, to a certain extent, the essential socio-psychological characteristics of the considered category of convicts are analyzed in detail, related to their position dependent on society and incomplete formation of intellectual and volitional qualities. These circumstances assume that they are taken into account while observing the principles of justice and humanism, which make it possible to ensure the proportionality of the measure of criminal law enforcement, the nature and degree of public danger of the crime, the identity of the perpetrator, as well as security from criminal infection and secondary victimization. Special consideration should be given to the characteristics of the perpetrator’s personality, as well as the significance of the sentence imposed for age-related socialization and crime prevention. It is concluded that the orientation of the law enforcement officer to impose punishment that is not associated with isolation from society should be supported by other criminal law institutions that are specially modified for this category of persons.

Download Full-text

PARADIGMA KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENANGGULANGAN KEJAHATAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN HUKUM PIDANA

Justitia et Pax ◽

10.24002/jep.v33i1.1418 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 33 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Gregorius Widiartana

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Restorative Justice ◽

Crime Prevention ◽

Criminal Law ◽

The Law

ABSTRACTThe criminal law that has been used as one of the means to eridicate crime is built on a retributive paradigm, so its repressive and coercive nature dominates. Based on the retributive paradigm, crime prevention is the sole authority of the law enforcement apparatus. Crime prevention based on the retributive paradigm is also offender oriented. Unlike the retributive paradigm, the paradigm of restorative justice offers another way of dealing with crime. In the retributive paradigm of justice, the sanction imposed does not aim to take revenge on the perpetrators of crime but rather sanctions that can arouse the perpetrator's responsibility for the suffering of the victim or sanction aimed at restoring the suffering of the victim. According to the paradigm of restorative justice, the process of solving crimes is done by involving perpetrators, victims and the community. Keywords: crime prevention, criminal law, retributive, restorative justice. INTISARIHukum pidana yang selama ini dipakai sebagai salah satu sarana untuk menangulangi kejahatan dibangun atas dasar paradigma retributif, sehingga sifatnya yang represif dan koersif begitu mendominasi. Berdasar paradigma retributif, penanggulangan kejahatan merupakan kewenangan tunggal aparat penegak hukum. Penanggulangan kejahatan berdasar paradigma retributif juga bersifat offender oriented. Berbeda dengan paradigma retributif, paradigma keadilan restoratif menawarkan cara lain dalam menanggulangi kejahatan. Dalam paradigma keadilan retributif, sanksi yang dijatuhkan tidak bertujuan untuk melakukan pembalasan terhadap pelaku kejahatan melainkan sanksi yang dapat menggugah tanggung jawab pelaku terhadap penderitaan korban atau sanksi yang bertujuan untuk memulihkan penderitaan korban. Menurut paradigma keadilan restoratif, proses penyelesaian kejahatan dilakukan dengan cara melibatkan pelaku, korban dan masyarakat. Kata kunci: Penanggulangan kejahatan, hukum pidana, retributif, keadilan restoratif.

Download Full-text

FORECASTING IN COMBATING CRIME AND IMPROVING THE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES OF LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES ON THE APPLICATION OF MEASURES OF CRIMINAL AND LEGAL IMPACT ON CRIME WITH THE CRITERIA OF THEIR EFFECTIVENESS

Proceedings of Southwest State University ◽

10.21869/2223-1560-2017-21-5-204-211 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 21 (5) ◽

pp. 204-211

Author(s):

V. E. Novichkov

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Crime Prevention ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Management Practices ◽

Criminal Responsibility ◽

Criminal Liability ◽

Point Of View ◽

Criminal Prosecution ◽

Law Enforcement Agencies ◽

Original Definition

The article discusses the possibility of prediction in combating crime in envisioning ways to improve the efficiency of law enforcement to impact crime through criminal law and other measures. Underline the fact that specified in the scope of this article aspects of domestic criminal law theory has not worked out common approaches, as evidenced by ongoing discussions on this issue. In particular, there is no common understanding of the logical-linguistic phenomena, among them the basic concept: "measures of criminal and legal impact", in connection with which the article is their original definition. For criminal law science, as with other legal Sciences remain difficult surveys to develop criteria for an effective impact on crime and forecasting. The paper presents the concept of "work" and management practices of law enforcement agencies on the effective application of measures of criminal and legal impact on crime and, primarily, on the basis of one of the main objectives of the criminal law - the prevention of crimes. The structure of this scheme consists of four groups that must be included in the development of forecasts in the sphere of fight against crime and its control and management. Is this: criminally-legal measures of crime prevention are in the educational effect on volatile and other persons and do not involve criminal responsibility; criminal-legal measures of crime prevention with the prevention of harmful consequences of the criminal act, deprivation of an offender to continue criminal activities, etc. achieved in the PU, the application of the perpetrators of legitimate violence (necessary defence, detention of the criminal) and criminal-law enforcement (criminal prosecution for preparation or attempted crime or completed less severe, compared to warned a crime); criminal - legal measures of implementation of criminal responsibility; other measures of impact on crime in furtherance of the purposes of criminal liability, beyond the considered groups, although having a number of their characteristics, as the application of the procedural measures of restraint in respect of suspects and accused persons, the application of compulsory measures of a medical nature to condemn alcoholics and drug addicts, all that is subordinated to the goal of preventing recurrence of crimes. Considering the issues of measures of criminal and legal impact on crime in connection with the prediction of the whole sphere of combating crime and related law enforcement the article notes the broad approach to the application of measures of criminal and legal impact on crime from the point of view of direct use of such measures in law enforcement for the prevention, suppression of crimes and the implementation of criminal responsibility is gained, sitela, which are based on criminal and other laws regulating the fight against crime. From the point of view of assessing practice effectiveness of the application of the criminal law as observationsas measures, the paper proposes to evaluate it according to formal parameters: the number of publications and broadcasts on television and radio, lectures, etc., and the effectiveness of these measures, as individual preventive measures is proposed to determine two parameters: the rate of detection of potential offenders (by retrospective analysis of the criminal cases of intentional crimes); the level of the positive impact of advocacy on identified potential offenders (by definition of the dynamics of the share of those who have committed crimes).

Download Full-text

Scientific and practical commentary on the Criminal Law Enforcement Code of the Russian Federation, 4th Edition

10.31085/9785392318315-2021-496 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

A.V. Brilliantov

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Criminal Law ◽

The Russian Federation

Download Full-text

APPLICATION FEATURES OF TECHNICAL AND FORENSIC TOOLS BY AN INVESTIGATOR (THE INTERROGATOR) DURING INTERROGATION IN THE PRETRIAL DETENTION CENTER

Vestnik Samarskogo iuridicheskogo instituta ◽

10.37523/sui.2020.39.3.007 ◽

2020 ◽

pp. 48-53

Author(s):

Роман Михайлович Морозов ◽

Дмитрий Юрьевич Волков

Keyword(s):

Law Enforcement ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Scientific Literature ◽

Preliminary Investigation ◽

Preventive Measure ◽

Criminal Procedure ◽

Evidence Based ◽

Detention Center ◽

Pretrial Detention ◽

Forensic Tools

Целью статьи было рассмотреть проблемные аспекты тактико-криминалистического применения технических средств при производстве допроса, предложить научно обоснованные рекомендации по их использованию. В статье раскрываются особенности применения технико-криминалистических средств процессуально уполномоченными должностными лицами органов предварительного следствия и дознания при производстве допроса подозреваемых (обвиняемых), в отношении которых избрана мера пресечения в виде заключения под стражу. По результатам проведенных исследований правоприменительной практики и научной литературы авторами раскрываются процессуальные и тактические основания и порядок применения технических средств при производстве допроса на отдельных его этапах, предлагаются решения проблем, связанных с применением технико-криминалистических средств, даются рекомендации по порядку применения отдельных технических средств. Выделяются наиболее целесообразные тактические приемы допроса при применении технических средств фиксации. Авторами предложены изменения в уголовно-процессуальное законодательство по совершенствованию законодательных норм в области применения технических средств при производстве следственных действий. Сформулированные в статье выводы могут быть использованы в правоприменительной практике следователями (дознавателями) при производстве допроса в следственном изоляторе, а также при преподавании отдельных дисциплин: «Уголовный процесс», «Криминалистика», а также специальных курсов (по выбору) уголовно-правового профиля. The purpose of the article was to consider the problematic aspects of the tactical and forensic use of technical means during the interrogation, to offer evidence-based recommendations for their use. The article reveals the features of the use of technical and forensic means by the procedurally authorized officials of the preliminary investigation and inquiry bodies during the interrogation of suspects (accused), in respect of which a preventive measure in the form of detention has been chosen. According to the results of the research of law enforcement practice and scientific literature, the authors reveal the procedural and tactical grounds and the procedure for the use of technical means during the interrogation at its individual stages, offers solutions to problems associated with the use of technical and forensic means, gives some recommendations on the order of application of individual technical means. The most appropriate tactics of interrogation, the use of technical facilities of fixation. The authors propose changes to the criminal procedure legislation to improve the legislative norms in the field of application of technical means in the investigative actions realization. The conclusions formulated in the article can be used in law enforcement practice by investigators (inquirers) during the interrogation in the pretrial detention center, as well as in the teaching of certain disciplines: «Criminal procedure», «Criminalistics», as well as special courses (optional) of criminal law profile.

Download Full-text

CRIMINAL LEGAL MEANS OF PROVIDING HEALTH CARE DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Sociopolitical sciences ◽

10.33693/2223-0092-2020-10-6-31-41 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (6) ◽

pp. 31-41

Author(s):

DANILA ILIN ◽

Keyword(s):

Health Care ◽

Law Enforcement ◽

Health System ◽

Russian Federation ◽

Criminal Law ◽

Social Life ◽

Criminal Liability ◽

General Description ◽

Theoretical Approaches ◽

The Russian Federation

The article presents the results of a study of the problems of criminal legal assessment of criminal attacks on the health care system during the COVID-19 pandemic. The social background of such crime and its criminological characteristics are studied. Given the fact that most of criminal law, aimed at preventing crime, reducing the capacity of the state in the fight against novel coronavirus infection treated in depth by the legal and regulatory framework is impeding the spread of the pandemic COVID-19, and analyzed Federal laws, decrees of the President of the Russian Federation, decisions and orders of the Government of the Russian Federation, orders of the Ministry of health of Russia and other state bodies governing the functioning of public authorities, medical institutions and organizations, the rights and obligations of citizens and legal entities, this includes measures for the prevention of this disease in various areas of social life that are additionally regulated during the COVID-19 pandemic. The task of optimizing the criminal law provision of health care during the COVID-19 pandemic is formulated, taking into account the actual situation with the spread of this infection and the practice of countering it. As part of this task, based on a critical analysis of existing approaches in the science of criminal law, we formulate our own concept of crimes that infringe on the health system during the COVID-19 pandemic, characterize the problem, study their legal and social nature, and systematize such crimes. On the basis of the obtained data, a General description of crimes that encroach on the health system during the COVID-19 pandemic is given, their criminal-legal features are considered, theoretical approaches to determining their essence are studied, and the author's position on this issue is formulated. The author's classification of crimes that hinder the provision of health care during the COVID-19 pandemic is given. Groups of such crimes are consistently considered. A General description of their objective and subjective characteristics is given. Proposals for improving the interpretation of the relevant criminal law norms in science and law enforcement practice have been developed, and suggestions for their improvement have been substantiated and formulated. The article is addressed not only to scientists and practitioners of law enforcement agencies, but also to doctors who often work in conditions of a lack of legal knowledge about their rights and obligations, the qualification of certain acts from the point of view of criminal law, the grounds and limits of criminal liability for those that constitute a crime, and algorithms for actions in case of detection of such acts.

Download Full-text