The Mechanism Research of the Station Individual Characteristic

Author(s):  
Chen Huixian ◽  
Yang Guozheng ◽  
Qi Jianwen ◽  
Liu Jingju
2020 ◽  
pp. 60-63
Author(s):  
Elena Senina

The author analyzes the category of viability as a structural element of social adaptation of patients who underwent revisional hip replacement. Considering the process of postoperative rehabilitation, the author focuses on viability as an individual characteristic of patients, which determines the effectiveness of physical recovery and social adaptation after hip replacement. The article observes the results of an empirical study conducted on the basis of Saratov Research Institute of Traumatology and Orthopedics of Minzdrav of Russia, aimed at studying the criteria of viability and social viability of adaptation and social adaptation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (44) ◽  
pp. 38-41
Author(s):  
Z. O. Maxammadiyev ◽  
◽  
A. A. Kasimov ◽  
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (11) ◽  
pp. 1134-1141
Author(s):  
Jian MA ◽  
◽  
Fu-kun SUN ◽  
Wei-jing LIAO ◽  
Zheng-feng HUANG ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3) ◽  
pp. 278
Author(s):  
Dongdong SHI ◽  
Yuanyuan KUANG ◽  
Guiming WANG ◽  
Zhangxiao PENG ◽  
Yan WANG ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 516 ◽  
pp. 120148
Author(s):  
Wenyuan Xu ◽  
Yan Wang ◽  
Suying Li ◽  
Yongbing Cheng ◽  
Fei Yan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yin Chung Au

AbstractThis paper proposes an extended version of the interventionist account for causal inference in the practical context of biological mechanism research. This paper studies the details of biological mechanism researchers’ practices of assessing the evidential legitimacy of experimental data, arguing why quantity and variety are two important criteria for this assessment. Because of the nature of biological mechanism research, the epistemic values of these two criteria result from the independence both between the causation of data generation and the causation in question and between different interventions, not techniques. The former independence ensures that the interventions in the causation in question are not affected by the causation that is responsible for data generation. The latter independence ensures the reliability of the final mechanisms not only in the empirical but also the formal aspects. This paper first explores how the researchers use quantity to check the effectiveness of interventions, where they at the same time determine the validity of the difference-making revealed by the results of interventions. Then, this paper draws a distinction between experimental interventions and experimental techniques, so that the reliability of mechanisms, as supported by the variety of evidence, can be safely ensured in the probabilistic sense. The latter process is where the researchers establish evidence of the mechanisms connecting the events of interest. By using case studies, this paper proposes to use ‘intervention’ as the fruitful connecting point of literature between evidence and mechanisms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document