The Role of Theory and Experiment in Language Design--A 15 Year Perspective

Author(s):  
Daniel Cooke ◽  
Brad Nemanich ◽  
J. Rushton
1970 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 73-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stanley Goldberg

It is a matter of record that Henri Poincaré never responded publicly to Einstein's Special Theory of Relativity (RT). Since almost no private papers of Poincaré are available, his attitude toward Einstein's work and his silence on that score become somewhat of a mystery. It is almost certain that Poincaré knew of Einstein's work in RT. First, he was fluent in German, having learned it as a young man when the Germans occupied his home town of Nancy in 1870. Second, he often reported to the members of the Académie des Sciences on current work in electrodynamics in Germany. It is highly improbable that he would have missed the abstract of Einstein's first paper on RT or the subsequent articles by Einstein on the subject, especially those which were translated into French, since they were in areas directly related to his own interests in theoretical physics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 300-310
Author(s):  
Sperydon Koumarianos ◽  
Rohith Kaiyum ◽  
Christopher J. Barrett ◽  
Neal Madras ◽  
Ozzy Mermut

We study here the role of polyelectrolyte chain length, that is number of repeat units (mers), in the competitive adsorption of a simple model polyanion onto 85 nm spherical silica particles capped with a model polycation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 560 ◽  
pp. 46-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Numan Şarlı ◽  
Fermin Ak ◽  
Evren Görkem Özdemir ◽  
Buket Saatçi ◽  
Ziya Merdan

2000 ◽  
Vol 84 (4) ◽  
pp. 757-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. H. Chun ◽  
M. B. Salamon ◽  
Y. Lyanda-Geller ◽  
P. M. Goldbart ◽  
P. D. Han

Author(s):  
Margaret C. Morrison

Experiment, as a specific category of scientific activity, did not emerge until the Scientific Revolution of the seventeenth century. Seen primarily as an arbiter in theory choice, there was little, if any, analysis of experimental techniques or, the ways in which data become transformed into established facts. Philosophical analysis of experiment was typically simplistic, focusing on the role of observation alone as the foundation for experimental facts. This was challenged by Thomas Kuhn who stressed the importance of background theory and beliefs in all perception, including (its role in) scientific experiment. This interconnection between theory and experiment severely undermined the idea that experiment could stand as an independent and objective criterion for judging the merits of one theory over another. In the 1980s new philosophical analyses of experiment began to emerge, emphasizing the ways in which experiment could be seen to have a life of its own embodying activities that could supposedly be understood without recourse to theory. Factors important in the evaluation of experimental results as well as the ways in which laboratory science differs from its theoretical counterpart became the focus for a new history and philosophy of experiment. Consequently, further debates arose regarding the relationship of experiment to theory, and whether it is possible to provide a methodological framework within which experimental practice can be evaluated.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vahid Dehghani ◽  
S. A. Alavi ◽  
‪Rohollah Razavinejad ◽  
Asim Soylu ◽  
fahrettin koyuncu

Abstract Adopting different neutron and proton density distributions the cluster decay half-lives have been investigated using double-folding potentials with constant and nuclear asymmetry dependent sets of the parameters of nuclear densities. Two adopted asymmetry dependent sets of the parameters are fitted based on the microscopic calculations and calculated based on the neutron skin/halo-type nuclei assumption and employing experimental rms charge radii. The bulk agreement between theory and experiment has been obtained for entire sets of parameters using calculated cluster preformation probability. The very little differences between skin and halo-type assumption have been observed. However, the notable role of the asymmetry parameter has been seen in relatively large differences between the skin and skin-type with zero thickness.


1999 ◽  
Vol 33 (10) ◽  
pp. 1139-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. I. Mashin ◽  
A. F. Khokhlov ◽  
S. K. Ignatov ◽  
A. A. Shchepalov ◽  
A. G. Razuvaev

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document