Uncertainty Evaluation Method of Electric Field Probe Based on Bayesian Principle

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinfei Qin ◽  
Qi Zhu ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Li Xue ◽  
Bingbing Cai
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Uncertainty Evaluation ◽  
Electric Field Probe

Development of a Low Frequency Electric Field Probe Integrating Data Acquisition and Storage

2020 ◽  
Vol E103.C (8) ◽  
pp. 345-352
Author(s):  
Zhongyuan ZHOU ◽  
Mingjie SHENG ◽  
Peng LI ◽  
Peng HU ◽  
Qi ZHOU
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Data Acquisition ◽  
Low Frequency ◽  
Frequency Electric Field ◽  
Electric Field Probe ◽  
And Storage

Liquid crystal fiber optic electric field probe

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Beatrys M. Lacquet ◽  
Pieter L. Swart ◽  
Stephanus J. Spammer
Keyword(s):  
Liquid Crystal ◽  
Electric Field ◽  
Fiber Optic ◽  
Crystal Fiber ◽  
Electric Field Probe

Development and Applications of a Fiber-Coupled Atom-Based Electric Field Probe

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher L. Holloway ◽  
Matt T. Simons ◽  
Marc Kautz ◽  
Perry F. Wilson ◽  
Joshua A. Gordon
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Electric Field Probe

Uncertainty Evaluation on Multi-Hole Aerodynamic Pressure Probes

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea Notaristefano ◽  
Paolo Gaetani ◽  
Vincenzo Dossena ◽  
Alberto Fusetti
Keyword(s):  
Uncertainty Analysis ◽  
Evaluation Method ◽  
Experimental Testing ◽  
Uncertainty Propagation ◽  
Calibration Procedure ◽  
Fast Response ◽  
Uncertainty Evaluation ◽  
Sensor Calibration ◽  
Pressure Probe ◽  
Aerodynamic Pressure

Abstract In the frame of a continuous improvement of the performance and accuracy in the experimental testing of turbomachines, the uncertainty analysis on measurements instrumentation and techniques is of paramount importance. For this reason, since the beginning of the experimental activities at the Laboratory of Fluid Machines (LFM) located at Politecnico di Milano (Italy), this issue has been addressed and different methodologies have been applied. This paper proposes a comparison of the results collected applying two methods for the measurement uncertainty quantification to two different aerodynamic pressure probes: sensor calibration, aerodynamic calibration and probe application are considered. The first uncertainty evaluation method is the so called “Uncertainty Propagation” method (UPM); the second is based on the “Monte Carlo” method (MCM). Two miniaturized pressure probes have been selected for this investigation: a pneumatic 5-hole probe and a spherical fast response aerodynamic pressure probe (sFRAPP), the latter applied as a virtual 4-hole probe. Since the sFRAPP is equipped with two miniaturized pressure transducers installed inside the probe head, a specific calibration procedure and a dedicated uncertainty analysis are required.

A Miniature High-Sensitivity Active Electric Field Probe for Near-Field Measurement

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 (12) ◽  
pp. 2552-2556 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zheng Min ◽  
Zhaowen Yan ◽  
Wei Liu ◽  
Jianwei Wang ◽  
Donglin Su ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electric Field ◽  
Field Measurement ◽  
Near Field ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Electric Field Probe ◽  
Near Field Measurement
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document