Software Reconfiguration Technology for Serviceable Satellite OBDH System

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiang Lianxiang ◽  
Xu Peipei ◽  
Fang Xuyang
Keyword(s):  
Software Reconfiguration

Design of On-orbit Software Reconfiguration for a General Signal Processing Platform Based on SOC Chip

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shengming Liang ◽  
Kang Wang ◽  
Haiyuan Wang ◽  
Ruichen Wang ◽  
Rui Guo
Keyword(s):  
Signal Processing ◽  
Software Reconfiguration ◽  
Processing Platform

scholarly journals Towards a consistent eddy-covariance processing: an intercomparison of EddyPro and TK3

2014 ◽  
Vol 7 (7) ◽  
pp. 2273-2281 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Fratini ◽  
M. Mauder
Keyword(s):  
Eddy Covariance ◽  
Global Scale ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Eddy Covariance Method ◽  
Software Configuration ◽  
Software Packages ◽  
Software Reconfiguration ◽  
Full Knowledge ◽  
Eddy Fluxes ◽  
Comparison Exercise

Abstract. A comparison of two popular eddy-covariance software packages is presented, namely, EddyPro and TK3. Two approximately 1-month long test data sets were processed, representing typical instrumental setups (i.e., CSAT3/LI-7500 above grassland and Solent R3/LI-6262 above a forest). The resulting fluxes and quality flags were compared. Achieving a satisfying agreement and understanding residual discrepancies required several iterations and interventions of different nature, spanning from simple software reconfiguration to actual code manipulations. In this paper, we document our comparison exercise and show that the two software packages can provide utterly satisfying agreement when properly configured. Our main aim, however, is to stress the complexity of performing a rigorous comparison of eddy-covariance software. We show that discriminating actual discrepancies in the results from inconsistencies in the software configuration requires deep knowledge of both software packages and of the eddy-covariance method. In some instances, it may be even beyond the possibility of the investigator who does not have access to and full knowledge of the source code. Being the developers of EddyPro and TK3, we could discuss the comparison at all levels of details and this proved necessary to achieve a full understanding. As a result, we suggest that researchers are more likely to get comparable results when using EddyPro (v5.1.1) and TK3 (v3.11) – at least with the setting presented in this paper – than they are when using any other pair of EC software which did not undergo a similar cross-validation. As a further consequence, we also suggest that, to the aim of assuring consistency and comparability of centralized flux databases, and for a confident use of eddy fluxes in synthesis studies on the regional, continental and global scale, researchers only rely on software that have been extensively validated in documented intercomparisons.

Multi-level software reconfiguration for sensor networks

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rahul Balani ◽  
Chih-Chieh Han ◽  
Ram Kumar Rengaswamy ◽  
Ilias Tsigkogiannis ◽  
Mani Srivastava
Keyword(s):  
Sensor Networks ◽  
Software Reconfiguration ◽  
Multi Level

Reconfigurable Intelligent Instrument Based on FPGA

2010 ◽  
Vol 44-47 ◽  
pp. 767-771
Author(s):  
Cheng Jin Gao ◽  
Sheng Sheng ◽  
Liang Liang Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Test System ◽  
Automatic Test ◽  
Automatic Test System ◽  
Software Reconfiguration ◽  
Configuration Data ◽  
Intelligent Instrument ◽  
Frame Technology ◽  
Hardware Reconfiguration

In this paper, we design the FPGA-based reconfigurable intelligent instrument which has eight different functions through hardware reconfiguration and software reconfiguration. Hardware reconfiguration is realized through loading different configuration data for FPGA. Software reconfiguration is realized through using reconfigurable application frame technology. We also develop the software demo system of FPGA-based reconfigurable intelligent instrument using Labwindows/CVI which has three functions. The orientation of this paper is the design in module level reconfiguration, to lay the foundation for building the reconfigurable automatic test system.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document