An Empirical Evaluation on Semantic Search Performance of Keyword-Based and Semantic Search Engines: Google, Yahoo, Msn and Hakia

Author(s):  
Duygu Tümer ◽  
Mohammad Ahmed Shah ◽  
Yiltan Bitirim
2017 ◽  
pp. 030-050
Author(s):  
J.V. Rogushina ◽  

Problems associated with the improve ment of information retrieval for open environment are considered and the need for it’s semantization is grounded. Thecurrent state and prospects of development of semantic search engines that are focused on the Web information resources processing are analysed, the criteria for the classification of such systems are reviewed. In this analysis the significant attention is paid to the semantic search use of ontologies that contain knowledge about the subject area and the search users. The sources of ontological knowledge and methods of their processing for the improvement of the search procedures are considered. Examples of semantic search systems that use structured query languages (eg, SPARQL), lists of keywords and queries in natural language are proposed. Such criteria for the classification of semantic search engines like architecture, coupling, transparency, user context, modification requests, ontology structure, etc. are considered. Different ways of support of semantic and otology based modification of user queries that improve the completeness and accuracy of the search are analyzed. On base of analysis of the properties of existing semantic search engines in terms of these criteria, the areas for further improvement of these systems are selected: the development of metasearch systems, semantic modification of user requests, the determination of an user-acceptable transparency level of the search procedures, flexibility of domain knowledge management tools, increasing productivity and scalability. In addition, the development of means of semantic Web search needs in use of some external knowledge base which contains knowledge about the domain of user information needs, and in providing the users with the ability to independent selection of knowledge that is used in the search process. There is necessary to take into account the history of user interaction with the retrieval system and the search context for personalization of the query results and their ordering in accordance with the user information needs. All these aspects were taken into account in the design and implementation of semantic search engine "MAIPS" that is based on an ontological model of users and resources cooperation into the Web.


Author(s):  
Alex Kohn ◽  
François Bry ◽  
Alexander Manta

Studies agree that searchers are often not satisfied with the performance of current enterprise search engines. As a consequence, more scientists worldwide are actively investigating new avenues for searching to improve retrieval performance. This paper contributes to YASA (Your Adaptive Search Agent), a fully implemented and thoroughly evaluated ontology-based information retrieval system for the enterprise. A salient particularity of YASA is that large parts of the ontology are automatically filled with facts by recycling and transforming existing data. YASA offers context-based personalization, faceted navigation, as well as semantic search capabilities. YASA has been deployed and evaluated in the pharmaceutical research department of Roche, Penzberg, and results show that already semantically simple ontologies suffice to considerably improve search performance.


Author(s):  
Daniel Crabtree

Web search engines help users find relevant web pages by returning a result set containing the pages that best match the user’s query. When the identified pages have low relevance, the query must be refined to capture the search goal more effectively. However, finding appropriate refinement terms is difficult and time consuming for users, so researchers developed query expansion approaches to identify refinement terms automatically. There are two broad approaches to query expansion, automatic query expansion (AQE) and interactive query expansion (IQE) (Ruthven et al., 2003). AQE has no user involvement, which is simpler for the user, but limits its performance. IQE has user involvement, which is more complex for the user, but means it can tackle more problems such as ambiguous queries. Searches fail by finding too many irrelevant pages (low precision) or by finding too few relevant pages (low recall). AQE has a long history in the field of information retrieval, where the focus has been on improving recall (Velez et al., 1997). Unfortunately, AQE often decreased precision as the terms used to expand a query often changed the query’s meaning (Croft and Harper (1979) identified this effect and named it query drift). The problem is that users typically consider just the first few results (Jansen et al., 2005), which makes precision vital to web search performance. In contrast, IQE has historically balanced precision and recall, leading to an earlier uptake within web search. However, like AQE, the precision of IQE approaches needs improvement. Most recently, approaches have started to improve precision by incorporating semantic knowledge.


Author(s):  
Oğuzhan Menemencioğlu ◽  
İlhami Muharrem Orak

Semantic web works on producing machine readable data and aims to deal with large amount of data. The most important tool to access the data which exist in web is the search engine. Traditional search engines are insufficient in the face of the amount of data that consists in the existing web pages. Semantic search engines are extensions to traditional engines and overcome the difficulties faced by them. This paper summarizes semantic web, concept of traditional and semantic search engines and infrastructure. Also semantic search approaches are detailed. A summary of the literature is provided by touching on the trends. In this respect, type of applications and the areas worked for are considered. Based on the data for two different years, trend on these points are analyzed and impacts of changes are discussed. It shows that evaluation on the semantic web continues and new applications and areas are also emerging. Multimedia retrieval is a newly scope of semantic. Hence, multimedia retrieval approaches are discussed. Text and multimedia retrieval is analyzed within semantic search.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Uyar ◽  
Farouk Musa Aliyu

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to better understand three main aspects of semantic web search engines of Google Knowledge Graph and Bing Satori. The authors investigated: coverage of entity types, the extent of their support for list search services and the capabilities of their natural language query interfaces. Design/methodology/approach – The authors manually submitted selected queries to these two semantic web search engines and evaluated the returned results. To test the coverage of entity types, the authors selected the entity types from Freebase database. To test the capabilities of natural language query interfaces, the authors used a manually developed query data set about US geography. Findings – The results indicate that both semantic search engines cover only the very common entity types. In addition, the list search service is provided for a small percentage of entity types. Moreover, both search engines support queries with very limited complexity and with limited set of recognised terms. Research limitations/implications – Both companies are continually working to improve their semantic web search engines. Therefore, the findings show their capabilities at the time of conducting this research. Practical implications – The results show that in the near future the authors can expect both semantic search engines to expand their entity databases and improve their natural language interfaces. Originality/value – As far as the authors know, this is the first study evaluating any aspect of newly developing semantic web search engines. It shows the current capabilities and limitations of these semantic web search engines. It provides directions to researchers by pointing out the main problems for semantic web search engines.


2012 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2985-2992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lilac Al-Safadi ◽  
Dalal Al-Rgebh ◽  
Wejdan AlOhali

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document