Comparative Study of Feature Extraction Methods with K-NN for Off-Line Signature Verification

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javed Mahar ◽  
Mumtaz Mahar ◽  
Muhammad Khan
Keyword(s):  
Feature Extraction ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Signature Verification

scholarly journals Offline Signature Identification and Verification Based on Capsule Representations

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 60-67
Author(s):  
Dilara Gumusbas ◽  
Tulay Yildirim
Keyword(s):  
Feature Extraction ◽  
Daily Life ◽  
Extraction Methods ◽  
Signature Verification ◽  
Verification Task ◽  
Feature Representations ◽  
Automatic Feature Extraction ◽  
Offline Signature Verification ◽  
Orientation Information ◽  
Trained Network

AbstractOffline signature is one of the frequently used biometric traits in daily life and yet skilled forgeries are posing a great challenge for offline signature verification. To differentiate forgeries, a variety of research has been conducted on hand-crafted feature extraction methods until now. However, these methods have recently been set aside for automatic feature extraction methods such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN). Although these CNN-based algorithms often achieve satisfying results, they require either many samples in training or pre-trained network weights. Recently, Capsule Network has been proposed to model with fewer data by using the advantage of convolutional layers for automatic feature extraction. Moreover, feature representations are obtained as vectors instead of scalar activation values in CNN to keep orientation information. Since signature samples per user are limited and feature orientations in signature samples are highly informative, this paper first aims to evaluate the capability of Capsule Network for signature identification tasks on three benchmark databases. Capsule Network achieves 97 96, 94 89, 95 and 91% accuracy on CEDAR, GPDS-100 and MCYT databases for 64×64 and 32×32 resolutions, which are lower than usual, respectively. The second aim of the paper is to generalize the capability of Capsule Network concerning the verification task. Capsule Network achieves average 91, 86, and 89% accuracy on CEDAR, GPDS-100 and MCYT databases for 64×64 resolutions, respectively. Through this evaluation, the capability of Capsule Network is shown for offline verification and identification tasks.

scholarly journals SIGNATURE IDENTIFICATION AND VERIFICATION SYSTEMS: A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE ONLINE AND OFFLINE TECHNIQUES

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-45
Author(s):  
Nehal Hamdy Al-banhawy ◽  
◽  
Heba Mohsen ◽  
Neveen Ghali ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Feature Extraction ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Active Area ◽  
Signature Verification ◽  
Classification Techniques ◽  
Verification Systems ◽  
Identification Techniques ◽  
Handwritten Signature ◽  
Verification Techniques

Handwritten signature identification and verification has become an active area of research in recent years. Handwritten signature identification systems are used for identifying the user among all users enrolled in the system while handwritten signature verification systems are used for authenticating a user by comparing a specific signature with his signature that is stored in the system. This paper presents a review for commonly used methods for pre-processing, feature extraction and classification techniques in signature identification and verification systems, in addition to a comparison between the systems implemented in the literature for identification techniques and verification techniques in online and offline systems with taking into consideration the datasets used and results for each system

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document