Multi Objective Portfolio Optimization Models and Its Solution Using Genetic Algorithms

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ch. Chiranjeevi ◽  
V. N. Sastry
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Optimization Models ◽  
Multi Objective

The robustness of portfolio efficient frontiers

2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (2) ◽  
pp. 300-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonis Pavlou ◽  
Michalis Doumpos ◽  
Constantin Zopounidis
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Value At Risk ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Conditional Value At Risk ◽  
Optimization Models ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Efficient Frontiers ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Rolling Window ◽  
Out Of Sample

Purpose The optimization of investment portfolios is a topic of major importance in financial decision making, with many relevant models available in the relevant literature. The purpose of this paper is to perform a thorough comparative assessment of different bi-objective models as well as multi-objective one, in terms of the performance and robustness of the whole set of Pareto optimal portfolios. Design/methodology/approach In this study, three bi-objective models are considered (mean-variance (MV), mean absolute deviation, conditional value-at-risk (CVaR)), as well as a multi-objective model. An extensive comparison is performed using data from the Standard and Poor’s 500 index, over the period 2005–2016, through a rolling-window testing scheme. The results are analyzed using novel performance indicators representing the deviations between historical (estimated) efficient frontiers, actual out-of-sample efficient frontiers and realized out-of-sample portfolio results. Findings The obtained results indicate that the well-known MV model provides quite robust results compared to other bi-objective optimization models. On the other hand, the CVaR model appears to be the least robust model. The multi-objective approach offers results which are well balanced and quite competitive against simpler bi-objective models, in terms of out-of-sample performance. Originality/value This is the first comparative study of portfolio optimization models that examines the performance of the whole set of efficient portfolios, proposing analytical ways to assess their stability and robustness over time. Moreover, an extensive out-of-sample testing of a multi-objective portfolio optimization model is performed, through a rolling-window scheme, in contrast static results in prior works. The insights derived from the obtained results could be used to design improved and more robust portfolio optimization models, focusing on a multi-objective setting.

scholarly journals A New Approach to Group Multi-Objective Optimization under Imperfect Information and Its Application to Project Portfolio Optimization

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 4575
Author(s):  
Eduardo Fernández ◽  
Nelson Rangel-Valdez ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
Claudia Gomez-Santillan
Keyword(s):  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Imperfect Information ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Final Decision ◽  
Project Portfolio ◽  
Objective Functions ◽  
Multi Objective Optimization ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Group Member

This paper addresses group multi-objective optimization under a new perspective. For each point in the feasible decision set, satisfaction or dissatisfaction from each group member is determined by a multi-criteria ordinal classification approach, based on comparing solutions with a limiting boundary between classes “unsatisfactory” and “satisfactory”. The whole group satisfaction can be maximized, finding solutions as close as possible to the ideal consensus. The group moderator is in charge of making the final decision, finding the best compromise between the collective satisfaction and dissatisfaction. Imperfect information on values of objective functions, required and available resources, and decision model parameters are handled by using interval numbers. Two different kinds of multi-criteria decision models are considered: (i) an interval outranking approach and (ii) an interval weighted-sum value function. The proposal is more general than other approaches to group multi-objective optimization since (a) some (even all) objective values may be not the same for different DMs; (b) each group member may consider their own set of objective functions and constraints; (c) objective values may be imprecise or uncertain; (d) imperfect information on resources availability and requirements may be handled; (e) each group member may have their own perception about the availability of resources and the requirement of resources per activity. An important application of the new approach is collective multi-objective project portfolio optimization. This is illustrated by solving a real size group many-objective project portfolio optimization problem using evolutionary computation tools.

Multi-objective seismic design of BRBs-reinforced concrete buildings using genetic algorithms

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herian Leyva ◽  
Juan Bojórquez ◽  
Edén Bojórquez ◽  
Alfredo Reyes-Salazar ◽  
Julián Carrillo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Genetic Algorithms ◽  
Reinforced Concrete ◽  
Seismic Design ◽  
Reinforced Concrete Buildings ◽  
Concrete Buildings ◽  
Multi Objective

scholarly journals Modeling and Optimizing the Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem with Trapezoidal Fuzzy Parameters

2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Alejandro Estrada-Padilla ◽  
Daniela Lopez-Garcia ◽  
Claudia Gómez-Santillán ◽  
Héctor Joaquín Fraire-Huacuja ◽  
Laura Cruz-Reyes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Steady State ◽  
Portfolio Optimization ◽  
Optimization Problem ◽  
Solution Process ◽  
Density Estimator ◽  
Nsga Ii ◽  
Spatial Spread ◽  
Multi Objective ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Portfolio Optimization Problem

A common issue in the Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Problem (MOPOP) is the presence of uncertainty that affects individual decisions, e.g., variations on resources or benefits of projects. Fuzzy numbers are successful in dealing with imprecise numerical quantities, and they found numerous applications in optimization. However, so far, they have not been used to tackle uncertainty in MOPOP. Hence, this work proposes to tackle MOPOP’s uncertainty with a new optimization model based on fuzzy trapezoidal parameters. Additionally, it proposes three novel steady-state algorithms as the model’s solution process. One approach integrates the Fuzzy Adaptive Multi-objective Evolutionary (FAME) methodology; the other two apply the Non-Dominated Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II) methodology. One steady-state algorithm uses the Spatial Spread Deviation as a density estimator to improve the Pareto fronts’ distribution. This research work’s final contribution is developing a new defuzzification mapping that allows measuring algorithms’ performance using widely known metrics. The results show a significant difference in performance favoring the proposed steady-state algorithm based on the FAME methodology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document