The Research of the Training Assistant Decision-Making Support System Based on Data Mining Technology

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi Ziyan
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Support System ◽  
Mining Technology ◽  
Decision Making Support

The Research of WebGIS-Based Data Mining

2011 ◽  
Vol 267 ◽  
pp. 774-777
Author(s):  
Chun Chang Fu
Keyword(s):  
Data Mining ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Decision Support ◽  
Network Analysis ◽  
Gis Analysis ◽  
Mining Technology ◽  
Mass Data ◽  
Support Level ◽  
Decision Making Support

Data mining provide us a technical found potential knowledge technical from mass data , the data mining technology is applied to GIS can promote GIS analysis of the data, so as to improve the ability of decision support level. WebGIS is traditional GIS space outspread, current network analysis and decision making support capability are low, the network-based integration of data mining and WebGIS can strengthen the analytical capacity.

scholarly journals Real-Time AI-Based Informational Decision-Making Support System Utilizing Dynamic Text Sources

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (13) ◽  
pp. 6237
Author(s):  
Azharul Islam ◽  
KyungHi Chang
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Random Forest ◽  
Support System ◽  
Classification Accuracy ◽  
Short Term Memory ◽  
Learning Algorithm ◽  
Unstructured Data ◽  
Stochastic Gradient Descent ◽  
Decision Making Support

Unstructured data from the internet constitute large sources of information, which need to be formatted in a user-friendly way. This research develops a model that classifies unstructured data from data mining into labeled data, and builds an informational and decision-making support system (DMSS). We often have assortments of information collected by mining data from various sources, where the key challenge is to extract valuable information. We observe substantial classification accuracy enhancement for our datasets with both machine learning and deep learning algorithms. The highest classification accuracy (99% in training, 96% in testing) was achieved from a Covid corpus which is processed by using a long short-term memory (LSTM). Furthermore, we conducted tests on large datasets relevant to the Disaster corpus, with an LSTM classification accuracy of 98%. In addition, random forest (RF), a machine learning algorithm, provides a reasonable 84% accuracy. This research’s main objective is to increase the application’s robustness by integrating intelligence into the developed DMSS, which provides insight into the user’s intent, despite dealing with a noisy dataset. Our designed model selects the random forest and stochastic gradient descent (SGD) algorithms’ F1 score, where the RF method outperforms by improving accuracy by 2% (to 83% from 81%) compared with a conventional method.

The Evaluation of Decision-Making Support Systems' Functionality

2011 ◽  
pp. 329-338 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giusseppi Forgionne ◽  
Stephen Russell
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Support System ◽  
Support Systems ◽  
Field Studies ◽  
Integrated System ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Individual System ◽  
Management Support Systems ◽  
Independent Effects ◽  
Decision Making Support

Contemporary decision-making support systems (DMSSs) are large systems that vary in nature, combining functionality from two or more classically defined support systems, often blurring the lines of their definitions. For example, in practical implementations, it is rare to find a decision support system (DSS) without executive information system (EIS) capabilities or an expert system (ES) without a recommender system capability. Decision-making support system has become an umbrella term spanning a broad range of systems and functional support capabilities (Alter, 2004). Various information systems have been proposed to support the decision-making process. Among others, there are DSSs, ESs, and management support systems (MSSs). Studies have been conducted to evaluate the decision effectiveness of each proposed system (Brown, 2005; Jean-Charles & Frédéric, 2003; Kanungo, Sharma, & Jain, 2001; Rajiv & Sarv, 2004). Case studies, field studies, and laboratory experiments have been the evaluation vehicles of choice (Fjermestad & Hiltz, 2001; James, Ramakrishnan, & Kustim, 2002; Kaplan, 2000). While for the most part each study has examined the decision effectiveness of an individual system, it has done so by examining the system as a whole using outcome- or user-related measures to quantify success and effectiveness (Etezadi-Amoli & Farhoomand, 1996; Holsapple & Sena, 2005; Jain, Ramamurthy, & Sundaram, 2006). When a study has included two or more systems, individual system effects typically have not been isolated. For example, Nemati, Steiger, Lyer, and Herschel (2002) presented an integrated system with both DSS and AI (artificial intelligence) functionality, but they did not explicitly test for the independent effects of the DSS and AI capabilities on the decision-making outcome and process. This article extends the previous work by examining the separate impacts of different DMSSs on decision effectiveness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document