scholarly journals Worst-case and Smoothed Analysis of the ICP Algorithm, with an Application to the k-means Method

Author(s):  
David Arthur ◽  
Sergei Vassilvitskii
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (03n04) ◽  
pp. 151-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Subhash Suri ◽  
Kevin Verbeek

Let [Formula: see text] be a set of stochastic sites, where each site is a tuple [Formula: see text] consisting of a point [Formula: see text] in [Formula: see text]-dimensional space and a probability [Formula: see text] of existence. Given a query point [Formula: see text], we define its most likely nearest neighbor (LNN) as the site with the largest probability of being [Formula: see text]’s nearest neighbor. The Most Likely Voronoi Diagram (LVD) of [Formula: see text] is a partition of the space into regions with the same LNN. We investigate the complexity of LVD in one dimension and show that it can have size [Formula: see text] in the worst-case. We then show that under non-adversarial conditions, the size of the [Formula: see text]-dimensional LVD is significantly smaller: (1) [Formula: see text] if the input has only [Formula: see text] distinct probability values, (2) [Formula: see text] on average, and (3) [Formula: see text] under smoothed analysis. We also describe a framework for LNN search using Pareto sets, which gives a linear-space data structure and sub-linear query time in 1D for average and smoothed analysis models as well as the worst-case with a bounded number of distinct probabilities. The Pareto-set framework is also applicable to multi-dimensional LNN search via reduction to a sequence of nearest neighbor and spherical range queries.


2011 ◽  
Vol 53 (6) ◽  
pp. 280-286 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bodo Manthey ◽  
Heiko Röglin

Author(s):  
J.D. Geller ◽  
C.R. Herrington

The minimum magnification for which an image can be acquired is determined by the design and implementation of the electron optical column and the scanning and display electronics. It is also a function of the working distance and, possibly, the accelerating voltage. For secondary and backscattered electron images there are usually no other limiting factors. However, for x-ray maps there are further considerations. The energy-dispersive x-ray spectrometers (EDS) have a much larger solid angle of detection that for WDS. They also do not suffer from Bragg’s Law focusing effects which limit the angular range and focusing distance from the diffracting crystal. In practical terms EDS maps can be acquired at the lowest magnification of the SEM, assuming the collimator does not cutoff the x-ray signal. For WDS the focusing properties of the crystal limits the angular range of acceptance of the incident x-radiation. The range is dependent upon the 2d spacing of the crystal, with the acceptance angle increasing with 2d spacing. The natural line width of the x-ray also plays a role. For the metal layered crystals used to diffract soft x-rays, such as Be - O, the minimum magnification is approximately 100X. In the worst case, for the LEF crystal which diffracts Ti - Zn, ˜1000X is the minimum.


2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sonia Savelli ◽  
Susan Joslyn ◽  
Limor Nadav-Greenberg ◽  
Queena Chen

Author(s):  
Akira YAMAWAKI ◽  
Hiroshi KAMABE ◽  
Shan LU
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document