Fast recursive least square-based active and reactive power estimator for single-phase power electronic converters

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taesic Kim ◽  
Ron Huerta ◽  
Jianwu Zeng ◽  
Chung Sing Leung ◽  
Sung-won Park
Keyword(s):  
Single Phase ◽  
Reactive Power ◽  
Least Square ◽  
Power Electronic ◽  
Recursive Least Square ◽  
Power Electronic Converters ◽  
Active And Reactive Power

Sizing Approach for a Single-Phase Grid-Connected Photovoltaic Converter with Active and Reactive Power Management

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosa Iris Viera-Diaz ◽  
Mario Gonzalez-Garcia ◽  
Ricardo Alvarez-Salas ◽  
Homero Miranda ◽  
Yuniel Leon-Ruiz
Keyword(s):  
Power Management ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Reactive Power ◽  
Photovoltaic Converter ◽  
Active And Reactive Power

scholarly journals Fuzzy Logic Control for Low-Voltage Ride-Through Single-Phase Grid-Connected PV Inverter

Energies ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (24) ◽  
pp. 4796 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eyad Radwan ◽  
Mutasim Nour ◽  
Emad Awada ◽  
Ali Baniyounes
Keyword(s):  
Fuzzy Logic ◽  
Output Power ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Reactive Power ◽  
Low Voltage ◽  
Operating Conditions ◽  
Pv System ◽  
Utilization Factor ◽  
Low Voltage Ride Through ◽  
Active And Reactive Power

This paper presents a control scheme for a photovoltaic (PV) system that uses a single-phase grid-connected inverter with low-voltage ride-through (LVRT) capability. In this scheme, two PI regulators are used to adjust the power angle and voltage modulation index of the inverter; therefore, controlling the inverter’s active and reactive output power, respectively. A fuzzy logic controller (FLC) is also implemented to manage the inverter’s operation during the LVRT operation. The FLC adjusts (or de-rates) the inverter’s reference active and reactive power commands based on the grid voltage sag and the power available from the PV system. Therefore, the inverter operation has been divided into two modes: (i) Maximum power point tracking (MPPT) during the normal operating conditions of the grid, and (ii) LVRT support when the grid is operating under faulty conditions. In the LVRT mode, the de-rating of the inverter active output power allows for injection of some reactive power, hence providing voltage support to the grid and enhancing the utilization factor of the inverter’s capacity. The proposed system was modelled and simulated using MATLAB Simulink. The simulation results showed good system performance in response to changes in reference power command, and in adjusting the amount of active and reactive power injected into the grid.

scholarly journals The State of the Art of the Control Strategies for Single-Phase Electric Springs

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qingsong Wang ◽  
Panhong Chen ◽  
Fujin Deng ◽  
Ming Cheng ◽  
Giuseppe Buja
Keyword(s):  
Power Generation ◽  
Critical Loads ◽  
Single Phase ◽  
Reactive Power ◽  
State Of The Art ◽  
Control Strategies ◽  
Renewable Energy Sources ◽  
Advantages And Disadvantages ◽  
Load Demand ◽  
Active And Reactive Power

The concept of electric springs (ESs) has been proposed as a new solution for stabilizing power grid fed by intermittent renewable energy sources. With a battery or active power source (DC, on the inside), the ESs can provide both active and reactive power compensations. So far, three typical topologies of single-phase ESs have been reported. Unlike traditional devices where power generation follows the load demand, the ESs are associated with non-critical loads form the so-called smart loads that transfer the fluctuated power to the non-critical loads, adaptively, according to the intermittent nature of power generation. After reviewing the main control strategies of single-phase ESs, the paper analyzes their advantages and disadvantages as well as their suitable applications. Comparisons among different control strategies on a specific topology version are implemented. Finally, conclusions and possible future trends are pointed out.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document