[EISIC 2017 panel discussion] Ethical dilemmas in intelligence analysis: Implications for systems and operations

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. L. William Wong ◽  
Ioanna Lekea ◽  
Stelios Virvidakis ◽  
Joanna Lekea ◽  
Demosthenis P. Bakopoulos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Dilemmas ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Intelligence Analysis

Surgical innovation and ethical dilemmas: A panel discussion

2008 ◽  
Vol 75 (Suppl_6) ◽  
pp. S13-S21 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. LIEBERMAN ◽  
J. HERNDON ◽  
J. HAHN ◽  
J. J. FINS ◽  
A. REZAI
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Dilemmas ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Surgical Innovation

Beyond Requirements: Improving Software Tools for Intelligence Analysts

2005 ◽  
Vol 49 (10) ◽  
pp. 932-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Geitz ◽  
Brian Moon ◽  
Anita D'Amico ◽  
Robert R. Hoffman ◽  
Rob Page
Keyword(s):  
Software Development ◽  
Human Factors ◽  
Software Metrics ◽  
Development Process ◽  
Situational Awareness ◽  
Panel Discussion ◽  
Software Tools ◽  
Intelligence Analysis ◽  
Software Development Process ◽  
High Level

The goal of this panel is to discuss critical human factors concerns in the development of software for intelligence analysts. The panel presentations are designed to provide a high level overview of the software development process, the intelligence analysis process, and the challenges encountered in both obtaining user feedback. Presentations will examine a variety of issues including the analysis of imagery, text, information assurance, data fusion, visualization models and in establishing situational awareness, as well as empowering analysts with open source software. The panel discussion will focus on extracting generic processes that can be applied to obtaining more accurate software metrics, requirements and solutions from a world where certain topics cannot be discussed. Methods and metaphors for better describing to individuals working outside of the classified world the context a within which a tool will be used, may be touched upon, as well as identifying ways of overcoming both internal and external politics. Human factors concerns may also be addressed, such as evaluating how trust affects the feedback received from individual analysts and communication and interaction within and between groups of analysts. Identifying and overcoming potential perceptual problems in the software development process will also be discussed. The anticipated outcome of the panel will be to target individual processes, techniques and technologies that can be applied to obtaining requirements to support cognitive processes, which can in turn be applied developing software tools that better fit the needs intelligence analysts.

Ethical Dilemmas in Audiology

2011 ◽  
Vol 38 (Spring) ◽  
pp. 76-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashleigh J. Callahan ◽  
Norman J. Lass ◽  
Kimberly L. Richards ◽  
Andrea B. Yost ◽  
Kristen S. Porter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Dilemmas

Impact of a new course on students' potential behaviour on encountering ethical dilemmas

2001 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-302 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Goldie ◽  
Lisa Schwartz ◽  
Alex McConnachie ◽  
Jillian Morrison
Keyword(s):  
Ethical Dilemmas

Panel Discussion #1

1996 ◽  
Vol 9 (10) ◽  
pp. 87S-90S
Author(s):  
M Myers
Keyword(s):  
Panel Discussion

To Tell or Not to Tell, That Is the Question

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 236-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Knut Dalen
Keyword(s):  
Gender Differences ◽  
Ethics Education ◽  
Ethical Dilemmas ◽  
Continuous Process ◽  
Telephone Counseling ◽  
Counseling Service ◽  
Telephone Service

Ethical dilemmas encountered by psychologists have previously been studied in surveys and as formal ethical complaints. No previous publications have been found in which data from an ethics counseling telephone service for psychologists has been analyzed. The present study examines ethical dilemmas, as presented by members of the Norwegian Psychological Association calling the Ethics Telephone Counseling Service (ETCS) from 2001 through 2003. Psychologists seek counseling for a range of ethical dilemmas. Ethical dilemmas concerning confidentiality are those most commonly presented. Dilemmas concerning integrity are also fairly common, whereas dilemmas concerning competence are rarely presented. The study shows virtually no difference in frequency and nature of consultation based on how long a psychologist has been licensed. This study also shows only minor gender differences in the use of the ETCS. Possible implications for ethics education as a continuous process are discussed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document