scholarly journals Analyzing Chat Conversations of Pedophiles with Temporal Relational Semantic Systems

Author(s):  
Paul Elzinga ◽  
Karl Erich Wolff ◽  
Jonas Poelmans
Keyword(s):  
2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 106-109
Author(s):  
S Rajarajeshwari ◽  
◽  
G.Kalaimathi Priya ◽  
S.Grace Mary ◽  
Dr.V.Sambath kumar

Author(s):  
Yingxu Wang ◽  
Mehrdad Valipour ◽  
Omar A. Zatarain

Knowledge learning is the sixth and the most fundamental category of machine learning mimicking the brain. It is recognized that the semantic space of machine knowledge is a hierarchical concept network (HCN), which can be rigorously represented by formal concepts in concept algebra and semantic algebra. This paper presents theories and algorithms of hierarchical concept classification by quantitative semantic analysis based on machine learning. Semantic equivalence between formal concepts is rigorously measured by an Algorithm of Concept Equivalence Analysis (ACEA). The semantic hierarchy among formal concepts is quantitatively determined by an Algorithm of Relational Semantic Classification (ARSC). Experiments applying Algorithms ACEA and ARSC on a set of formal concepts have been successfully conducted, which demonstrate a deep machine understanding of formal concepts and quantitative relations in the hierarchical semantic space by machine learning beyond human empirical perspectives.


Author(s):  
Sameer S. Pradhan ◽  
Eduard Hovy ◽  
Mitch Marcus ◽  
Martha Palmer ◽  
Lance Ramshaw ◽  
...  

1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Sinha ◽  
Tania Kuteva

The “local semantics” approach to the analysis of the meaning of locative particles (e.g. spatial prepositions) is examined, criticized and rejected. An alternative, distributed approach to spatial relational semantics and its linguistic expression is argued for. In the first part of the paper, it is argued that spatial relational semantic information is not exclusively carried in languages such as English by the locative particle, and that “item-specific meanings plus selectional restrictions” cannot save the localist approach. In the second part of the paper, the “covertly” distributed spatial relational semantics of languages such as English is contrasted with the “overtly” distributed spatial relational semantics characterizing many other languages. Some common assumptions relating to the universality of the expression of spatial relational meaning by closed syntactic classes are criticized. A change of perspective from “local” to “distributed” semantics permits the re-analysis of polysemy and item-bound “use-type” in terms of the distributed expression of language-specific spatial relational semantic types.


2007 ◽  
Vol 01 (04) ◽  
pp. 405-419 ◽  
Author(s):  
SAMEER S. PRADHAN ◽  
EDUARD HOVY ◽  
MITCH MARCUS ◽  
MARTHA PALMER ◽  
LANCE RAMSHAW ◽  
...  

The OntoNotes project is creating a corpus of large-scale, accurate, and integrated annotation of multiple levels of the shallow semantic structure in text. Such rich, integrated annotation covering many levels will allow for richer, cross-level models enabling significantly better automatic semantic analysis. At the same time, it demands a robust, efficient, scalable mechanism for storing and accessing these complex inter-dependent annotations. We describe a relational database representation that captures both the inter- and intra-layer dependencies and provide details of an object-oriented API for efficient, multi-tiered access to this data.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document