Calculation of nodal gas prices using a game theory method

Author(s):  
Irina I. Golub ◽  
Tatiana V. Dzyubina
Keyword(s):  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Seyede Simin Mirhashemi Dehkordi ◽  
◽  
Hojjat Mianabadi ◽  

Abstract In the last century, water conflicts have increased in many parts of the world for reasons such as a strong desire for rapid development and poor governance. The impact of these conflicts on various sectors of society such as economic, political and legal subsystems has led researchers to focus on providing solutions and practical methods to deal with water conflicts. Game theory is one of the most common methods used by researchers to manage water conflicts and water allocation in shared and transboundary river basins. Despite the special place of game theory in reductionist sciences, the application of this theory to dealing with conflicts in complex water systems faces challenges. Whereas, the critique of the effectiveness of the game theory method in water conflict management has been neglected. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to investigate and analyze the capacity to apply the game theory to deal with water conflicts. In order to achieve this purpose, while using library resources, the basics of game theory and the capacity to apply it in the management of water conflicts are analyzed. The results reveal that following the theory of rational choice and rationalism in the game theory method has led to ignore many dimensions and factors affecting the water conflict formation and the way to deal with complex water conflicts. Keywords: Water Conflicts, Game Theory, Peacebuilding, Shared and Transboundary River Basins


2013 ◽  
Vol 409-410 ◽  
pp. 119-122
Author(s):  
Wei Hua Zhang ◽  
Jun Ying Jin ◽  
Ya Xin Han

Water trading is an effective method for efficient allocation of water resources, so it is essential to assess the potential impacts of water trading before the establishment of water rights trading market. The improved water rights allocation method may low down the uncertainty, although there is lots of uncertainty in the water trading for agriculture. This study compared the effects of two-part deployment method on economic profits of main crops by Game Theory method. The results show that water trading may optimally allocate water resources, moreover, the total free market could increase economic profits as far as possible; the more water users participating in water trading, the more profits the water trading can bring.


Author(s):  
Ade Momon Subagyo ◽  
Okky Jayadi ◽  
Ajeng Chintawati Dewi

<p><em>Terminal Klari that located in Kabupaten Karawang has a function</em> <em>as a temporary stop place for public vehicles to raise and lower passengers. PO Bus with Klari – Purwokerto route is the object of the research. The large number of PO busses on this route causes loyalty of the passenger is decline. These observations were made on 6 PO Busses with Klari – Purwokerto route and with 6 attributes, there are price, service, facilities, ease of getting information, easy of getting tickets, and the travel time. The objective of the research is to determine the competitive strategies based on the analysis of the bus brand switching by bus passengers with Klari – Purwokerto route. This research utilizes a Markov chain, game theory, and short route models. The results of processing and analysis using Markov chain, obtained that the market share reached steady state in the 11th period with a yield of 16.09% for Dedy Jaya, 29.35% for Murni Jaya, 25.13% for Sinar Jaya, 7.97% for Pahala Kencana, 10.69% for DMI, and 10.77% for Dieng Indah. From game theory method the results of the game there are several alternative strategies for DMI Buses, such as improving the means of promotion and communication so the passengers can get information with easily about Bus DMI. The alternative route from the short route model is Klari Terminal - Tol Kranci / Pejagan - Bumi Ayu - Purwokerto, with a total distance of 304.7 km.</em></p>


Author(s):  
Jinyu Shi ◽  
Zhongru Wang ◽  
Qiang Ruan ◽  
Yue Wu ◽  
Binxing Fang
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Mohammad Reza Jarkeh ◽  
Ameneh Mianabadi ◽  
Hojjat Mianabadi

Abstract. Mismanagement and uneven distribution of water may lead to or increase conflict among countries. Allocation of water among trans-boundary river neighbours is a key issue in utilization of shared water resources. The bankruptcy theory is a cooperative Game Theory method which is used when the amount of demand of riparian states is larger than total available water. In this study, we survey the application of seven methods of Classical Bankruptcy Rules (CBRs) including Proportional (CBR-PRO), Adjusted Proportional (CBR-AP), Constrained Equal Awards (CBR-CEA), Constrained Equal Losses (CBR-CEL), Piniles (CBR-Piniles), Minimal Overlap (CBR-MO), Talmud (CBR-Talmud) and four Sequential Sharing Rules (SSRs) including Proportional (SSR-PRO), Constrained Equal Awards (SSR-CEA), Constrained Equal Losses (SSR-CEL) and Talmud (SSR-Talmud) methods in allocation of the Euphrates River among three riparian countries: Turkey, Syria and Iraq. However, there is not a certain documented method to find more equitable allocation rule. Therefore, in this paper, a new method is established for choosing the most appropriate allocating rule which seems to be more equitable than other allocation rules to satisfy the stakeholders. The results reveal that, based on the new propose model, the CBR-AP seems to be more equitable to allocate the Euphrates River water among Turkey, Syria and Iraq.


Author(s):  
Saman Farahmand ◽  
Sama Goliaei ◽  
Zahra Razaghi Moghadam Kashani ◽  
Sina Farahmand
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document