LEGO Robot Programming Exercise Support for Problem Solving Learning with Game Strategy Planning Tools

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Tominaga ◽  
Yohei Onishi ◽  
Toshihiro Hayashi ◽  
Toshinori Yamasaki
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Robot Programming ◽  
Planning Tools ◽  
Strategy Planning

Problem-Solving Exercise for Robot Programming through Individual and Collaborative Learning

2020 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 4_68-4_73
Author(s):  
Orie DOEDA ◽  
Kazunori CHIDA ◽  
Hiroki HAYASHI ◽  
Yoshihiro TAKASAKA ◽  
Mizue KAYAMA
Keyword(s):  
Problem Solving ◽  
Collaborative Learning ◽  
Robot Programming

Method for Planning Multitasking Robot Application Programs in RAPID

2010 ◽  
Vol 166-167 ◽  
pp. 69-76
Author(s):  
Stelian Brad ◽  
Emilia Brad ◽  
Cosmin Ioanes
Keyword(s):  
Software Development ◽  
Programming Languages ◽  
Programming Language ◽  
Robot Programming ◽  
Careful Planning ◽  
Planning Tools ◽  
Robot Tasks ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Application Programs

In order to set up well-structured multitasking robot application programs careful planning is required. Robot programming languages (e.g. Karel, RAPID, Melfa, SimPro, etc.) vary from robot to robot constructor. General planning tools used in software development (e.g. UML, IDEF, etc.) require adequate professional skills and a special way of thinking such that robot programmers to apply and adapt them to the specificity of each robot programming language. Customized and intuitive planning tools of robot applications with regard to each particular programming language seem to be preferred by ordinary robot programmers and operators when facing with the development of complex robot tasks. This paper introduces such a tool in relation to the RAPIDTM programming language, specific to ABB robot models. Its effectiveness is revealed in a case study.

Coordination Between Track Two and Track One Diplomacy in Successful Cases of Prenegotiation

2006 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 65-89 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronald Fisher
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Analysis ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Information Sharing ◽  
The Other ◽  
Peace Processes ◽  
Joint Strategy ◽  
Strategy Planning ◽  
Opening Up ◽  
Important Form ◽  
Influential Individuals

AbstractAn important form of coordination between track one and track two diplomacy revolves around unofficial problem-solving workshops at the level of politically influential individuals that make contributions to the process and outcomes of official negotiations. These contributions typically occur during the prenegotiation phase through the opening up of communication, the improvement of attitudes, the analysis of conflict issues and dynamics, the development of frameworks, the creation of options directed toward resolution, and so on. In order for these effects to be maximally beneficial, coordination between unofficial and official interventions is essential. This study describes connections between track two and track one peacemakers through a comparative analysis of four successful instances where workshops made important prenegotiation and paranegotiation contributions to the official peace processes. The analysis finds that such coordination was limited mainly to information sharing and indirect sequencing of efforts, and that in only one case did it involve the more engaging activities of joint strategy planning and collaboration in implementation. The article concludes that there are inherent limitations to coordination between track one and track two, given their unique and independent roles, but that both domains are evidencing more acceptance and respect for the other, which augurs well for the field of conflict resolution in terms of coordination toward greater effectiveness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document