Towards Optimal Image Stitching for Virtual Microscopy

Author(s):  
B. Appleton ◽  
A.P. Bradley ◽  
M. Wildermoth
2007 ◽  
Vol 45 (05) ◽  
Author(s):  
F Sipos ◽  
S Spisák ◽  
T Krenács ◽  
O Galamb ◽  
B Galamb ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 184-187
Author(s):  
K. Rajasri ◽  
D. Gayathri ◽  
Balasundari Ilanthirayan ◽  
A. Sundra

2016 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 14-18
Author(s):  
Srishty Suman ◽  
Utkarsh Rastogi ◽  
Rajat Tiwari

Image stitching is the process of combining two or more images of the same scene as a single larger image. Image stitching is needed in many applications like video stabilization, video summarization, video compression, panorama creation. The effectiveness of image stitching depends on the overlap removal, matching of the intensity of images, the techniques used for blending the image. In this paper, the various techniques devised earlier for the image stitching and their applications in the relative places has been reviewed.


Author(s):  
Fernanda Somera dos Santos ◽  
Mariana Kiomy Osako ◽  
Gleici da Silva Castro Perdoná ◽  
Márcia Gaião Alves ◽  
Katiuchia Uzzun Sales

Author(s):  
Sheshang Degadwala ◽  
Utsho Chakraborty ◽  
Promise Kuri ◽  
Haimanti Biswas ◽  
Ahmed Nur Ali ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renata Zelic ◽  
Francesca Giunchi ◽  
Luca Lianas ◽  
Cecilia Mascia ◽  
Gianluigi Zanetti ◽  
...  

AbstractVirtual microscopy (VM) holds promise to reduce subjectivity as well as intra- and inter-observer variability for the histopathological evaluation of prostate cancer. We evaluated (i) the repeatability (intra-observer agreement) and reproducibility (inter-observer agreement) of the 2014 Gleason grading system and other selected features using standard light microscopy (LM) and an internally developed VM system, and (ii) the interchangeability of LM and VM. Two uro-pathologists reviewed 413 cores from 60 Swedish men diagnosed with non-metastatic prostate cancer 1998–2014. Reviewer 1 performed two reviews using both LM and VM. Reviewer 2 performed one review using both methods. The intra- and inter-observer agreement within and between LM and VM were assessed using Cohen’s kappa and Bland and Altman’s limits of agreement. We found good repeatability and reproducibility for both LM and VM, as well as interchangeability between LM and VM, for primary and secondary Gleason pattern, Gleason Grade Groups, poorly formed glands, cribriform pattern and comedonecrosis but not for the percentage of Gleason pattern 4. Our findings confirm the non-inferiority of VM compared to LM. The repeatability and reproducibility of percentage of Gleason pattern 4 was poor regardless of method used warranting further investigation and improvement before it is used in clinical practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document