An egocentric perspective on active vision and visual object learning in toddlers

All tests described below have a visual representation inFig. A1 , where tests are indicated in the figure caption:Fig. A1. Visualization of the 10 Cognition Battery Tests. 1 5 Motor Praxis; 2 5 Visual Object Learning Test; 3 5 FractalNBACK; 4 5 Abstract Matching; 5 5 Line Orientation Test; 6 5 Emotion Recognition Test; 7 5 Matrix Reasoning Test;8 5 Digit Symbol Substitution Test; 9 5 Balloon Analog Risk Task; 10 5 Psychomotor Vigilance Test. [Reprinted withpermission from Moore TM, et al. Validation of the Cognition Test Battery for Spacefl ight in a sample of highly educatedadults. Aerosp. Med. Hum. Perform. 2017; 88(10):937–946 (Appendix A, Fig. A1; https://doi.org/10.3357/AMHP.4801sd.2017).]

Download Full-text

Reliability, performance characteristics, construct validity, and an initial clinical application of a Visual Object Learning Test (VOLT).

Neuropsychology ◽

10.1037/0894-4105.11.4.602 ◽

1997 ◽

Vol 11 (4) ◽

pp. 602-612 ◽

Cited By ~ 41

Author(s):

David C. Glahn ◽

Ruben C. Gur ◽

J. Daniel Ragland ◽

David M. Censits ◽

Raquel E. Gur

Keyword(s):

Construct Validity ◽

Clinical Application ◽

Performance Characteristics ◽

Visual Object ◽

Object Learning ◽

Learning Test ◽

Reliability Performance

Download Full-text

The Distributed Nature of Visual Object Learning

Plasticity in Sensory Systems ◽

10.1017/cbo9781139136907.002 ◽

2013 ◽

pp. 9-32

Author(s):

Hans P. Op de Beeck

Keyword(s):

Visual Object ◽

Object Learning

Download Full-text

The neural basis of visual object learning

Trends in Cognitive Sciences ◽

10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.002 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 14 (1) ◽

pp. 22-30 ◽

Cited By ~ 61

Author(s):

Hans P. Op de Beeck ◽

Chris I. Baker

Keyword(s):

Visual Object ◽

Neural Basis ◽

Object Learning

Download Full-text

Use It and Still Lose It?

GeroPsych ◽

10.1024/1662-9647/a000020 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 23 (3) ◽

pp. 169-175 ◽

Cited By ~ 14

Author(s):

Adrian Schwaninger ◽

Diana Hardmeier ◽

Judith Riegelnig ◽

Mike Martin

Keyword(s):

Object Recognition ◽

Cognitive Development ◽

Recognition Test ◽

Cognitive Aging ◽

Recognition Task ◽

Airport Security ◽

Visual Object ◽

Long Term Effects ◽

Object Recognition Test ◽

X Ray

In recent years, research on cognitive aging increasingly has focused on the cognitive development across middle adulthood. However, little is still known about the long-term effects of intensive job-specific training of fluid intellectual abilities. In this study we examined the effects of age- and job-specific practice of cognitive abilities on detection performance in airport security x-ray screening. In Experiment 1 (N = 308; 24–65 years), we examined performance in the X-ray Object Recognition Test (ORT), a speeded visual object recognition task in which participants have to find dangerous items in x-ray images of passenger bags; and in Experiment 2 (N = 155; 20–61 years) in an on-the-job object recognition test frequently used in baggage screening. Results from both experiments show high performance in older adults and significant negative age correlations that cannot be overcome by more years of job-specific experience. We discuss the implications of our findings for theories of lifespan cognitive development and training concepts.

Download Full-text