An Investigation of Factors Affecting Student Group Project Outcomes

2005 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pearl Brereton ◽  
Sue Lees
Keyword(s):  
Student Group ◽  
Group Project ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Project Outcomes

Music Then and Now: Using Technology to Build a Lyric Animation Module

2019 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 264-276 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wayne Geerling ◽  
G. Dirk Mateer ◽  
Brian O’Roark
Keyword(s):  
Student Group ◽  
Group Project ◽  
The Everyday ◽  
The Creation ◽  
Do It Yourself ◽  
Set Up ◽  
Jel Classifications

This article describes a student group project (Music for Econ) which synthesizes music with economics and is a great way to connect with your audience. We trace the journey of Music for Econ from its inception as a Pop-Up video in the early 2000s through to the creation of a Music for Econ library on Critical Commons. Music for Econ is a pedagogical device which can be used to demonstrate the everyday application of economics and help unlock student creativity. Consequently, we provide the instructor with a do it yourself (DIY) manual, which shows them how to set up the project, customize it depending on the size of their class, and how to avoid common pitfalls. We also include an end of project survey template for reference and future use in an appendix. More broadly, Music for Econ is simply fun to watch if you like music and enjoy leaning about economics. JEL Classifications: A20, A21, A22

A Water Quality Study in Rutherford County, Tennessee: Student Group Project

2006 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 118-126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca R. James ◽  
Albert E. Ogden ◽  
John P. DiVincenzo
Keyword(s):  
Water Quality ◽  
Student Group ◽  
Group Project ◽  
Rutherford County ◽  
Quality Study

scholarly journals Sustainability After Project Completion: Evidence from the GEF

2022 ◽  
pp. 43-57
Author(s):  
Neeraj Kumar Negi ◽  
Molly Watts Sohn
Keyword(s):  
Political Support ◽  
Market Change ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Project Completion ◽  
Project Outcomes ◽  
Project Outcome ◽  
Catalytic Processes ◽  
Project Sustainability

AbstractThis chapter examines the extent to which completed GEF projects are sustainable and the factors affecting sustainability. We considered only those projects that were covered through postcompletion evaluation at least 2 years after implementation completion, and where the evaluation reports provided adequate information related to observed sustainability during the postcompletion period. We assessed 62 projects to meet the selection criteria, then completed a desk review of the postcompletion evaluation reports and other relevant documents for these projects to assess the extent to which the project outcome was sustainable.We found that the projects covered through postcompletion evaluations were generally sustainable, with the sustainability outlook deteriorating for some projects while improving for others. The incidence of the catalytic processes that enhance sustainability—sustaining, mainstreaming, replication, scaling-up, and market change—was higher at postcompletion evaluation, as the passage of time allows long-term project outcomes to manifest. At the project level, we observed these catalytic processes in a wider set of activities at postcompletion evaluation than at implementation completion. Factors such as financial support for follow-up, political support, follow-up by and capacities of the executing agency, stakeholder buy-in, and project design seem to play a crucial role in determining project sustainability.

A student group project in operating system implementation

1978 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 197-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Comaa ◽  
J. Kramer ◽  
B. K. Penney
Keyword(s):  
Operating System ◽  
System Implementation ◽  
Student Group ◽  
Group Project

Producing a real-world student group project

2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pam Hogarth ◽  
Gil Zimmerman ◽  
Craig Sylvester ◽  
Kat Curry
Keyword(s):  
Real World ◽  
Student Group ◽  
Group Project
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document