scholarly journals Rapid Processing of Synthetic Seismograms Using Windows Azure Cloud

Author(s):  
Vedaprakash Subramanian ◽  
Liqiang Wang ◽  
En-Jui Lee ◽  
Po Chen
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Casini ◽  
C. Pech-Georgel ◽  
B. Burle ◽  
J. Ziegler

1987 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
pp. 73-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kathryn Rowan ◽  
P. Byass ◽  
R. W. Snow

SummaryThis paper reports on a computerised approach to the management of an epidemiological field trial, which aimed at determining the effects of insecticide-impregnated bed nets on the incidence of malaria in children. The development of a data system satisfying the requirements of the project and its implementation using a database management system are discussed. The advantages of this method of management in terms of rapid processing of and access to data from the study are described, together with the completion rates and error rates observed in data collection.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 996
Author(s):  
James P. Trujillo ◽  
Judith Holler

During natural conversation, people must quickly understand the meaning of what the other speaker is saying. This concerns not just the semantic content of an utterance, but also the social action (i.e., what the utterance is doing—requesting information, offering, evaluating, checking mutual understanding, etc.) that the utterance is performing. The multimodal nature of human language raises the question of whether visual signals may contribute to the rapid processing of such social actions. However, while previous research has shown that how we move reveals the intentions underlying instrumental actions, we do not know whether the intentions underlying fine-grained social actions in conversation are also revealed in our bodily movements. Using a corpus of dyadic conversations combined with manual annotation and motion tracking, we analyzed the kinematics of the torso, head, and hands during the asking of questions. Manual annotation categorized these questions into six more fine-grained social action types (i.e., request for information, other-initiated repair, understanding check, stance or sentiment, self-directed, active participation). We demonstrate, for the first time, that the kinematics of the torso, head and hands differ between some of these different social action categories based on a 900 ms time window that captures movements starting slightly prior to or within 600 ms after utterance onset. These results provide novel insights into the extent to which our intentions shape the way that we move, and provide new avenues for understanding how this phenomenon may facilitate the fast communication of meaning in conversational interaction, social action, and conversation.


1984 ◽  
Vol 32 (5) ◽  
pp. 197-197
Author(s):  
S. Moriuchi ◽  
K. Kameoka ◽  
E. Okustu

Geophysics ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 422-432 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Hearn ◽  
E. S. Krebes

A plane wave propagating in a viscoelastic medium is generally inhomogeneous, meaning that the direction in which the spatial rate of amplitude attenuation is maximum is generally different from the direction of travel. The angle between these two directions, which we call the “attenuation angle,” is an acute angle. In order to trace the ray corresponding to a plane wave propagating between a source point and a receiver point in a layered viscoelastic medium, one must know both the initial propagation angle (the angle that the raypath makes with the vertical) and the initial attenuation angle at the source point. In some recent literature on the computation of ray‐synthetic seismograms in anelastic media, values for the initial attenuation angle are chosen arbitrarily; but this approach is fundamentally unsatisfactory, since different choices lead to different results for the computed waveforms. Another approach, which is more deterministic and physically acceptable, is to deduce the value of the initial attenuation angle from the value of the complex ray parameter at the saddle point of the complex traveltime function. This value can be obtained by applying the method of steepest descent to evaluate approximately the integrals giving the exact wave field at the observation point. This well‐known technique results in the ray‐theory limit. The initial propagation angle can also be determined from the saddle point. Among all possible primary rays between source and receiver, each having different initial propagation and attenuation angles, the ray determined by the saddle point, which we call a “stationary ray,” has the smallest traveltime, a result which is consistent with Fermat’s principle of least time. Such stationary rays are complex rays, i.e., the spatial (e.g., Cartesian) coordinates of points on stationary raypaths are complex numbers, whereas the arbitrarily determined rays mentioned above are usually traced as real rays. We compare examples of synthetic seismograms computed with stationary rays with those from some arbitrarily determined rays. If the initial value of the attenuation angle is arbitrarily chosen to be a constant for all initial propagation angles, the differences between the two types of seismograms are generally small or negligible in the subcritical zone, except when the constant is relatively large in value, say, within 10 degrees or so of its upper bound of 90 degrees. In that case, the differences are significant but still not large. However, if the surface layer is highly absorptive, the differences can be quite large and pronounced. For larger offsets, i.e., in the supercritical zone, large phase discrepancies can exist between the waveforms for the stationary rays and those for the arbitrarily determined rays, even if the constant initial attenuation angle is not large and even for moderate absorptivity in the surface layer.


2011 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 1065-1073 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez ◽  
Marcia Grabowecky ◽  
German Palafox ◽  
Satoru Suzuki

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document