Comparison of Mechanisms for Reducing Handover Latency and Packet Loss Problems of Route Optimization in MIPv6

Author(s):  
Aumdevi K. Barbudhe ◽  
Vishwajit K. Barbudhe ◽  
Chitra Dhawale
2006 ◽  
Vol 48 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Ambrosy ◽  
Oliver Blume ◽  
Dirk Hofmann ◽  
Edgar Kühn ◽  
Stuttgart Tobias Küfner

Mobile IP (MIP) protocols are candidates for seamless mobility support in heterogeneous networks with different radio access technologies. Handover requirements are analysed by Random-Way-Point mobility simulations. We then simulated packet loss, delay and network load during MIP and Fast MIP handover to identify the main contributions to handover latency. Best performance is found for MIP in Make-Before-Break scenario.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 127-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianbo Yang ◽  
Xinsheng Ji

Abstract In the process of inter-domain handover, according to the partner-based hierarchical mobile IPv6 protocol (PHMIPv6), the longer configuration time for a new care-of-address may cause an interrupt in the current wireless connections and cause higher handover latency and packet loss rate. This paper proposes an improved handover mechanism based on PHMIPv6, named B-CDHO. A fPN and bPN are defined respectively in B-CDHO as cooperative relay nodes during the handover process. fPN can get the new care-of-address instead of a mobile terminal before the handover triggers and bPN can avoid connection interrupt if the prehandover time is longer. The analysis and simulation results both show that B-CDHO can reduce the handover latency and packet loss in comparison to HMIPv6 and PHMIPv6 in case the pre-handover delay is longer.


Electronics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (12) ◽  
pp. 1519
Author(s):  
Madeeha Aman ◽  
Saeed Mahfooz ◽  
Muhammad Zubair ◽  
Neelam Mukhtar ◽  
Kanwal Imran ◽  
...  

The number of wireless services and devices have remarkably increased, especially since the introduction of smart phones. The population of mobile nodes (MNs) is now exceeding the traditional non-mobile nodes. Mobility is a key factor in mobile core networks as it is responsible for providing continuous communication when a MN is on the move. Currently, a centralized mobile core network architecture is implemented, which has certain limitations. Distributed mobility management (DMM) is often seen as a solution to the problems associated with centralized mobility management (CMM). Address and tunneling management are big challenges for current DMM-based mobility protocols. Keeping in mind the current advancement of mobile network architecture, this paper proposes a novel tunnel-free distributed mobility management support protocol intended for such an evolution. In addition, the performance of the existing DMM IPv6 mobility management protocols in the context of handover latency, handover blocking probability, and data packet loss is analyzed and compared to the proposed framework. The performance analyses show that the proposed tunnel-free method can reduce about 12% of handover latency, 71% of handover blocking probability, and 82% of data packet loss.


Author(s):  
Badiea Abdulkarem Mohammed ◽  
Tat-Chee Wan

To fulfill the need for on-the-move and uninterrupted internet connectivity in Mobile Networks, IETF NEMO working group was created to extend basic end-host mobility support in Mobile IPv6 (MIPv6) protocol. NEMO Basic Support Protocol (NEMO) has been standardized by this group to provide the network mobility support. However, the handover latency in NEMO is high and, the nested tunnels’ problem in the nested NEMO networks is not considered. Many schemes have been proposed to solve these problems by optimizing the handover signaling procedure, and by proposing routing optimization scheme for NEMO. Better optimized signaling procedure is proposed in this paper, and a proposed Routing Optimization scheme as a solution for the lack of the nested tunnels’ problem is proposed as well. Analytical results highlight the importance of the proposed scheme comparing to others are provided, revealing that the proposed scheme has the lowest handover latency and disruption time.


2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (4) ◽  
pp. 401-408
Author(s):  
Shunya Tanabe ◽  
Zeyuan Sun ◽  
Masayuki Nakatani ◽  
Yutaka Uchimura

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document