Feedback control resource management using a posteriori workload characterizations

Author(s):  
D.R. Alexander ◽  
D.A. Lawrence ◽  
L.R. Welch
2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 1061-1075 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rafael Tolosana-Calasanz ◽  
Javier Diaz-Montes ◽  
Omer F. Rana ◽  
Manish Parashar

2018 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-49
Author(s):  
Pablo Fernando Pessoa de Freitas ◽  
Catarina Cecília Odelius

Abstract This study presents a literature review on managerial competencies (MC) in order to identify the most mentioned classifications of MC in empirical studies (including schemes, models, categorizations, or even the mere identification of MC in a particular locus of research) from 2005 to 2015. Using bibliographic research and content analysis with a posteriori classification, 46 articles were investigated, along with their common and seminal references. It was concluded that the Quinn model was the most recurrent during the period studied as it appeared in 12 studies. Regarding the other 34 articles, the MC categories with a higher incidence were: result oriented (clients, processes, costs, market, products, projects, etc.); ability to work with people and teams (interpersonal relationship, cooperation, etc.); leadership, coordination, and motivation; ability to work in changing environments (innovation and situational adaptability capability); communication; planning; knowledge management; organization and control (resource allocation, mobilization, and monitoring); Attitudes and Values (ethics, initiative, commitment, etc.); and knowledge and technical skills in the field. Inquiries and criticisms were presented for the last two categories. Among several research recommendations, studies should identify the most relevant MC, even generic or transversal ones, in order to facilitate or allow the diagnosis of MC, providing further studies to concentrate on mapping specific competencies of the studied locus of research, as well as the replication of the study to verify the dynamic behavior of MC over time.


Author(s):  
Domenico Grimaldi ◽  
Valerio Persico ◽  
Antonio Pescape ◽  
Alessandro Salvi ◽  
Stefania Santini

Author(s):  
Domenico Grimaldi ◽  
Valerio Persico ◽  
Antonio Pescape ◽  
Alessandro Salvi ◽  
Stefania Santini

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 30 ◽  
Author(s):  
Krishna Lal Poudel ◽  
Thomas G. Johnson ◽  
Rachna Tewari

<p class="emsd"><span lang="EN-GB">This paper reviews recent research articles in the field of property rights and natural resources management, with the goal of identifying the most effective policy measures to achieve sustainable resource management through well designed property rights. Scarcity of economic resources is a major cause of conflict in human society. Institutions impact the resilience of the environment, and the institutions which guide humans as they employ resources from the environment are therefore essential to sustainable resource management. Institutions which create and enforce property rights can control resource degradation and improve both economic and ecological efficiency. Property rights which lead to an equitable allocation of natural resources and delegation of management authority among stakeholders is the most likely pathway to sustainable ecosystem management. However, there is a lack of consensus regarding the best system of property rights to achieve sustainability. The ‘best system’ is contextual and spatiotemporal dynamic. </span></p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document