A linear lower bound on the unbounded error probabilistic communication complexity

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Forster
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Communication Complexity

Lower bounds for cutting planes proofs with small coefficients

1997 ◽  
Vol 62 (3) ◽  
pp. 708-728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Bonet ◽  
Toniann Pitassi ◽  
Ran Raz
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Cutting Planes ◽  
Communication Complexity ◽  
Proof System ◽  
Small Weight ◽  
Deduction Rule ◽  
Special Case ◽  
Exponential Lower Bound

AbstractWe consider small-weight Cutting Planes (CP*) proofs; that is, Cutting Planes (CP) proofs with coefficients up to Poly(n). We use the well known lower bounds for monotone complexity to prove an exponential lower bound for the length of CP* proofs, for a family of tautologies based on the clique function. Because Resolution is a special case of small-weight CP, our method also gives a new and simpler exponential lower bound for Resolution.We also prove the following two theorems: (1) Tree-like CP* proofs cannot polynomially simulate non-tree-like CP* proofs. (2) Tree-like CP* proofs and Bounded-depth-Frege proofs cannot polynomially simulate each other.Our proofs also work for some generalizations of the CP* proof system. In particular, they work for CP* with a deduction rule, and also for any proof system that allows any formula with small communication complexity, and any set of sound rules of inference.

Lower Bounds on OBDD Proofs with Several Orders

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 1-30
Author(s):  
Sam Buss ◽  
Dmitry Itsykson ◽  
Alexander Knop ◽  
Artur Riazanov ◽  
Dmitry Sokolov
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Communication Complexity ◽  
Multiparty Communication ◽  
Constant Degree ◽  
Polynomial Size ◽  
Explicit Constant ◽  
Open Question ◽  
System 1 ◽  
Exponential Size

This article is motivated by seeking lower bounds on OBDD(∧, w, r) refutations, namely, OBDD refutations that allow weakening and arbitrary reorderings. We first work with 1 - NBP ∧ refutations based on read-once nondeterministic branching programs. These generalize OBDD(∧, r) refutations. There are polynomial size 1 - NBP(∧) refutations of the pigeonhole principle, hence 1-NBP(∧) is strictly stronger than OBDD}(∧, r). There are also formulas that have polynomial size tree-like resolution refutations but require exponential size 1-NBP(∧) refutations. As a corollary, OBDD}(∧, r) does not simulate tree-like resolution, answering a previously open question. The system 1-NBP(∧, ∃) uses projection inferences instead of weakening. 1-NBP(∧, ∃ k is the system restricted to projection on at most k distinct variables. We construct explicit constant degree graphs G n on n vertices and an ε > 0, such that 1-NBP(∧, ∃ ε n ) refutations of the Tseitin formula for G n require exponential size. Second, we study the proof system OBDD}(∧, w, r ℓ ), which allows ℓ different variable orders in a refutation. We prove an exponential lower bound on the complexity of tree-like OBDD(∧, w, r ℓ ) refutations for ℓ = ε log n , where n is the number of variables and ε > 0 is a constant. The lower bound is based on multiparty communication complexity.

scholarly journals Detecting cliques in CONGEST networks

2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 533-543
Author(s):  
Artur Czumaj ◽  
Christian Konrad
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Distributed Computing ◽  
Communication Complexity ◽  
Communication Protocol ◽  
Distributed Model ◽  
Input Graph ◽  
Communication Framework ◽  
Communication Topology ◽  
Communication Links ◽  
Underlying Network

AbstractThe problem of detecting network structures plays a central role in distributed computing. One of the fundamental problems studied in this area is to determine whether for a given graph H, the input network contains a subgraph isomorphic to H or not. We investigate this problem for H being a clique $$K_{\ell }$$ K ℓ in the classical distributed model, where the communication topology is the same as the topology of the underlying network, and with limited communication bandwidth on the links. Our first and main result is a lower bound, showing that detecting $$K_{\ell }$$ K ℓ requires $$\varOmega (\sqrt{n} / {\mathfrak {b}})$$ Ω ( n / b ) communication rounds, for every $$4 \le \ell \le \sqrt{n}$$ 4 ≤ ℓ ≤ n , and $$\varOmega (n / (\ell {\mathfrak {b}}))$$ Ω ( n / ( ℓ b ) ) rounds for every $$\ell \ge \sqrt{n}$$ ℓ ≥ n , where $${\mathfrak {b}}$$ b is the bandwidth of the communication links. This result is obtained by using a reduction to the set disjointness problem in the framework of two-party communication complexity. We complement our lower bound with a two-party communication protocol for listing all cliques in the input graph, which up to constant factors communicates the same number of bits as our lower bound for $$K_4$$ K 4 detection. This demonstrates that our lower bound cannot be improved using the two-party communication framework.

scholarly journals A comparison of two lower-bound methods for communication complexity

1996 ◽  
Vol 168 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-51 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Dietzfelbinger ◽  
Juraj Hromkovič ◽  
Georg Schnitger
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Communication Complexity

On the orthogonal rank and impossibility of quantum round elimination

2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1&2) ◽  
pp. 106-116
Author(s):  
Jop Briet ◽  
Jeroen Zuiddam
Keyword(s):  
Lower Bound ◽  
Communication Complexity ◽  
Quantum Communication ◽  
Hamming Distance ◽  
Cayley Graphs ◽  
Affirmative Answer ◽  
Complex Vector ◽  
Total Communication ◽  
Quantum Communication Complexity ◽  
The Cost

After Bob sends Alice a bit, she responds with a lengthy reply. At the cost of a factor of two in the total communication, Alice could just as well have given Bob her two possible replies at once without listening to him at all, and have him select which one applies. Motivated by a conjecture stating that this form of “round elimination” is impossible in exact quantum communication complexity, we study the orthogonal rank and a symmetric variant thereof for a certain family of Cayley graphs. The orthogonal rank of a graph is the smallest number d for which one can label each vertex with a nonzero d-dimensional complex vector such that adjacent vertices receive orthogonal vectors. We show an exp(n) lower bound on the orthogonal rank of the graph on {0, 1} n in which two strings are adjacent if they have Hamming distance at least n/2. In combination with previous work, this implies an affirmative answer to the above conjecture.

scholarly journals Lower Bounds for Dynamic Algebraic Problems

1998 ◽  
Vol 5 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Gudmund Skovbjerg Frandsen ◽  
Johan P. Hansen ◽  
Peter Bro Miltersen
Keyword(s):  
Fourier Transform ◽  
Lower Bound ◽  
Lower Bounds ◽  
Communication Complexity ◽  
Symmetric Functions ◽  
Matrix Multiplication ◽  
Worst Case ◽  
Dynamic Matrix ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
On Line

We consider dynamic evaluation of algebraic functions (matrix multiplication, determinant, convolution, Fourier transform, etc.) in the model of Reif and Tate; i.e., if f(x1, . . . , xn) = (y1, . . . , ym) is an algebraic problem, we consider serving on-line requests of the form "change input xi to value v" or "what is the value of output yi?". We present techniques for showing lower bounds on the worst case time complexity per operation for such problems. The first gives lower bounds in a wide range of rather powerful models (for instance history dependent<br />algebraic computation trees over any infinite subset of a field, the integer RAM, and the generalized real RAM model of Ben-Amram and Galil). Using this technique, we show optimal  Omega(n) bounds for dynamic matrix-vector product, dynamic matrix multiplication and dynamic discriminant and an <br />Omega(sqrt(n)) lower bound for dynamic polynomial multiplication (convolution), providing a good match with Reif and<br />Tate's O(sqrt(n log n)) upper bound. We also show linear lower bounds for dynamic determinant, matrix adjoint and matrix inverse and an Omega(sqrt(n)) lower bound for the elementary symmetric functions. The second technique is the communication complexity technique of Miltersen, Nisan, Safra, and Wigderson which we apply to the setting<br />of dynamic algebraic problems, obtaining similar lower bounds in the word RAM model. The third technique gives lower bounds in the weaker straight line program model. Using this technique, we show an ((log n)2= log log n) lower bound for dynamic discrete Fourier transform. Technical ingredients of our techniques are the incompressibility technique of Ben-Amram and Galil and the lower bound for depth-two superconcentrators of Radhakrishnan and Ta-Shma. The incompressibility technique is extended to arithmetic computation in arbitrary fields.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document