Method engineering-a framework for improved computer based medical systems design

Author(s):  
P. Kokol
1993 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
John Kruse

Author(s):  
Gilbert Willett

This paper details one faculty members approach to developing a prototype module for a computer based instruction (CBI) course in foundational neuroscience for physical therapy students. The process was based on the generic instructional systems design model, ADDIE. ADDIE is an acronym for Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. Each step has an outcome that feeds the subsequent step or results in modification of the prior step in order to reach the desired outcome. The analysis section summarizes the state of the global academic environment in health professions education and the environment at the University of Nebraska Medical Center (UNMC) where the project took place. Events that led to development of the CBI course module are described and results of a national and local survey analysis to determine the level of interest in a CBI course for foundational neuroscience are reported. The design section outlines formation of the design team for the CBI module and describes the pedagogy of the module. Development explains the rational for determining the mode of CBI delivery, reports the amount of faculty time required for module development, and lists the equipment needed and skills required. Implementation reviews the process employed for peer validation of content and for student editorial feedback. Evaluation consists of a summary pre and post-test of results and qualitative feedback provided by test students.


Author(s):  
Craig E. Kuziemsky

The design and implementation of healthcare information systems (HIS) is problematic as many HIS projects do not achieve the desired outcomes. There exist a number of theories to enhance our ability to successfully develop HIS. Examples of such theories include ‘fit’ and the sociotechnical approach. However, there are few empirical studies that illustrate how to understand and operationalize such theories at the empirical level needed for HIS design. This chapter introduces a practice support framework that bridges the gap between the theoretical and empirical aspects of HIS design by identifying specific process and information practice supports that need to be considered to actively produce fit of an HIS within a healthcare setting. The chapter also provides an empirical case study of how practice support was used to develop a computer based tool in the domain area of palliative care severe pain management.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document