SSDP: A Simple Evolutionary Approach for Top-K Discriminative Patterns in High Dimensional Databases

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarcisio Pontes ◽  
Renato Vimieiro ◽  
Teresa Bernarda Ludermir
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Approach ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Discriminative Patterns

A new evolutionary algorithm for mining top-k discriminative patterns in high dimensional data

2017 ◽  
Vol 59 ◽  
pp. 487-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarcísio Lucas ◽  
Túlio C.P.B. Silva ◽  
Renato Vimieiro ◽  
Teresa B. Ludermir
Keyword(s):  
Evolutionary Algorithm ◽  
High Dimensional Data ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Discriminative Patterns

scholarly journals Mining Low-Support Discriminative Patterns from Dense and High-Dimensional Data

2012 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 279-294 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Fang ◽  
Gaurav Pandey ◽  
Wen Wang ◽  
Manish Gupta ◽  
Michael Steinbach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Dimensional Data ◽  
High Dimensional ◽  
Discriminative Patterns

Cognitive gadgets: A provocative but flawed manifesto

2019 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco Del Giudice
Keyword(s):  
Theory Of Mind ◽  
Cultural Differences ◽  
Twin Studies ◽  
Cross Cultural ◽  
Evolutionary Approach ◽  
Genetic Inheritance ◽  
Double Standards ◽  
Cross Cultural Differences ◽  
Cherry Picking ◽  
Dichotomous Thinking

Abstract The argument against innatism at the heart of Cognitive Gadgets is provocative but premature, and is vitiated by dichotomous thinking, interpretive double standards, and evidence cherry-picking. I illustrate my criticism by addressing the heritability of imitation and mindreading, the relevance of twin studies, and the meaning of cross-cultural differences in theory of mind development. Reaching an integrative understanding of genetic inheritance, plasticity, and learning is a formidable task that demands a more nuanced evolutionary approach.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document