Portal for research in electrophysiology — Data integration with neuroscience information framework

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petr Bruha ◽  
Roman Moucek
Keyword(s):  
Data Integration ◽  
Information Framework ◽  
Neuroscience Information Framework

scholarly journals Assessing value of biomedical digital repositories

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Nan Hsu ◽  
Anita Bandrowski ◽  
Jeffrey S. Grethe ◽  
Maryann E. Martone
Keyword(s):  
Research Community ◽  
Digital Repository ◽  
Digital Repositories ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
Quality Aspects ◽  
Resource Identification ◽  
Citation Practices ◽  
Information Framework ◽  
Neuroscience Information Framework

Digital repositories bring direct impact and influence on the research community and society but measuring their value using formal metrics remains challenging. their value. It is challenging to define a single perfect metric that covers all quality aspects. Here, we distinguish here between impact and influence and discuss measures and mentions as the basis of quality metrics of a digital repository. We argue that these challenges may potentially be overcome through the introduction of standard resource identification and data citation practices. We briefly summarize our research and experience in the Neuroscience Information Framework, the BD2K BioCaddie project on data citation, and the Resource Identification Initiative. Full implementation of these standards will depend on cooperation from all stakeholders --- digital repositories, authors, publishers, and funding agencies, but both resource and data citation have been gaining support with researchers and publishers.

scholarly journals A hybrid human and machine resource curation pipeline for the Neuroscience Information Framework

Database ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (0) ◽  
pp. bas005-bas005 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. E. Bandrowski ◽  
J. Cachat ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
H. M. Muller ◽  
P. W. Sternberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Framework ◽  
Neuroscience Information Framework

scholarly journals Assessing value of biomedical digital repositories

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Nan Hsu ◽  
Anita Bandrowski ◽  
Jeffrey S. Grethe ◽  
Maryann E. Martone
Keyword(s):  
Research Community ◽  
Digital Repository ◽  
Digital Repositories ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
Quality Aspects ◽  
Resource Identification ◽  
Citation Practices ◽  
Information Framework ◽  
Neuroscience Information Framework

Digital repositories bring direct impact and influence on the research community and society but measuring their value using formal metrics remains challenging. their value. It is challenging to define a single perfect metric that covers all quality aspects. Here, we distinguish here between impact and influence and discuss measures and mentions as the basis of quality metrics of a digital repository. We argue that these challenges may potentially be overcome through the introduction of standard resource identification and data citation practices. We briefly summarize our research and experience in the Neuroscience Information Framework, the BD2K BioCaddie project on data citation, and the Resource Identification Initiative. Full implementation of these standards will depend on cooperation from all stakeholders --- digital repositories, authors, publishers, and funding agencies, but both resource and data citation have been gaining support with researchers and publishers.

scholarly journals Assessing value of biomedical digital repositories

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun-Nan Hsu ◽  
Anita Bandrowski ◽  
Jeffrey S. Grethe ◽  
Maryann E. Martone
Keyword(s):  
Research Community ◽  
Digital Repository ◽  
Digital Repositories ◽  
Data Citation ◽  
Funding Agencies ◽  
Quality Aspects ◽  
Resource Identification ◽  
Citation Practices ◽  
Information Framework ◽  
Neuroscience Information Framework

Digital repositories bring direct impact and influence on the research community and society but measuring their value using formal metrics remains challenging. their value. It is challenging to define a single perfect metric that covers all quality aspects. Here, we distinguish here between impact and influence and discuss measures and mentions as the basis of quality metrics of a digital repository. We argue that these challenges may potentially be overcome through the introduction of standard resource identification and data citation practices. We briefly summarize our research and experience in the Neuroscience Information Framework, the BD2K BioCaddie project on data citation, and the Resource Identification Initiative. Full implementation of these standards will depend on cooperation from all stakeholders --- digital repositories, authors, publishers, and funding agencies, but both resource and data citation have been gaining support with researchers and publishers.

scholarly journals The Neuroscience Information Framework (NIF): a neuroscience-centered portal for searching and accessing diverse resources

2009 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maryann Martone ◽  
Ettore Mosca ◽  
Roberta Alfieri ◽  
Federica Viti ◽  
Ivan Merelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Information Framework ◽  
Neuroscience Information Framework

scholarly journals The Neuroscience Information Framework: A Data and Knowledge Environment for Neuroscience

2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 149-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Gardner ◽  
Huda Akil ◽  
Giorgio A. Ascoli ◽  
Douglas M. Bowden ◽  
William Bug ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Knowledge Environment ◽  
Information Framework ◽  
Neuroscience Information Framework
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document