scholarly journals Input Feature Selection Method Based on Feature Set Equivalence and Mutual Information Gain Maximization

IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 151525-151538 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinzheng Wang ◽  
Bing Guo ◽  
Yan Shen ◽  
Chimin Zhou ◽  
Xuliang Duan
Author(s):  
Gang Liu ◽  
Chunlei Yang ◽  
Sen Liu ◽  
Chunbao Xiao ◽  
Bin Song

A feature selection method based on mutual information and support vector machine (SVM) is proposed in order to eliminate redundant feature and improve classification accuracy. First, local correlation between features and overall correlation is calculated by mutual information. The correlation reflects the information inclusion relationship between features, so the features are evaluated and redundant features are eliminated with analyzing the correlation. Subsequently, the concept of mean impact value (MIV) is defined and the influence degree of input variables on output variables for SVM network based on MIV is calculated. The importance weights of the features described with MIV are sorted by descending order. Finally, the SVM classifier is used to implement feature selection according to the classification accuracy of feature combination which takes MIV order of feature as a reference. The simulation experiments are carried out with three standard data sets of UCI, and the results show that this method can not only effectively reduce the feature dimension and high classification accuracy, but also ensure good robustness.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. CIN.S3794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaosheng Wang ◽  
Osamu Gotoh

Gene selection is of vital importance in molecular classification of cancer using high-dimensional gene expression data. Because of the distinct characteristics inherent to specific cancerous gene expression profiles, developing flexible and robust feature selection methods is extremely crucial. We investigated the properties of one feature selection approach proposed in our previous work, which was the generalization of the feature selection method based on the depended degree of attribute in rough sets. We compared the feature selection method with the established methods: the depended degree, chi-square, information gain, Relief-F and symmetric uncertainty, and analyzed its properties through a series of classification experiments. The results revealed that our method was superior to the canonical depended degree of attribute based method in robustness and applicability. Moreover, the method was comparable to the other four commonly used methods. More importantly, the method can exhibit the inherent classification difficulty with respect to different gene expression datasets, indicating the inherent biology of specific cancers.


IEEE Access ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 116875-116885 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. S. Thejas ◽  
Sajal Raj Joshi ◽  
S. S. Iyengar ◽  
N. R. Sunitha ◽  
Prajwal Badrinath

Author(s):  
GULDEN UCHYIGIT ◽  
KEITH CLARK

Text classification is the problem of classifying a set of documents into a pre-defined set of classes. A major problem with text classification problems is the high dimensionality of the feature space. Only a small subset of these words are feature words which can be used in determining a document's class, while the rest adds noise and can make the results unreliable and significantly increase computational time. A common approach in dealing with this problem is feature selection where the number of words in the feature space are significantly reduced. In this paper we present the experiments of a comparative study of feature selection methods used for text classification. Ten feature selection methods were evaluated in this study including the new feature selection method, called the GU metric. The other feature selection methods evaluated in this study are: Chi-Squared (χ2) statistic, NGL coefficient, GSS coefficient, Mutual Information, Information Gain, Odds Ratio, Term Frequency, Fisher Criterion, BSS/WSS coefficient. The experimental evaluations show that the GU metric obtained the best F1 and F2 scores. The experiments were performed on the 20 Newsgroups data sets with the Naive Bayesian Probabilistic Classifier.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document