Disturbance rejection in setpoint tracking adaptive predictive controller design

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Chinvorarat ◽  
M.P. Schoen
Keyword(s):  
Disturbance Rejection ◽  
Controller Design ◽  
Predictive Controller

Neural Networks L2-Gain Controller Design for Nonlinear System

2011 ◽  
Vol 467-469 ◽  
pp. 1505-1510
Author(s):  
Dan Liu ◽  
Ni Hong Wang ◽  
Gui Ying Li
Keyword(s):  
Neural Network ◽  
Disturbance Rejection ◽  
Differential Inequality ◽  
Controller Design ◽  
Design Method ◽  
General Structure ◽  
The Neural Network ◽  
Network Weight ◽  
Finite Gain ◽  
L2 Gain

This paper proposes a new method that it uses the neural network to construct the solution of the Hamiltion-Jacobi inequality (HJ), and it carries on the optimization of the neural network weight using the genetic algorithm. This method causes the Lyapunov function to satisfy the HJ, avoides solving the HJ parital differential inequality, and overcomes the difficulty which the HJ parital differential inequality analysis. Beside this, it proposes a design method of a nonlinear state feedback L2-gain disturbance rejection controller based on HJ, and introduces general structure of L2-gain disturbance rejection controller in the form of neural network. The simulation demonstrates the design of controller is feasible and the closed-loop system ensures a finite gain between the disturbance and the output.

Multi-objective adaptive cruise controller design using nonlinear predictive controller with the objective function with variable weights determined by fuzzy logic controller

2021 ◽  
pp. 095440702110147
Author(s):  
Behzad Samani ◽  
Amir H. Shamekhi
Keyword(s):  
Objective Function ◽  
Fuzzy Logic Controller ◽  
Fuzzy Controller ◽  
Controller Design ◽  
Hierarchical Control ◽  
Control Input ◽  
Cruise Control ◽  
Model Predictive Controller ◽  
Control Step ◽  
Predictive Controller

In this paper, an adaptive cruise control system with a hierarchical control structure is designed. The upper-level controller is a model predictive controller (MPC) that by minimizing an objective function in the presence of the constraints, calculates the desired acceleration as control input and sends it to the lower-level controller. So the lower-level controller, which is a fuzzy controller, determines the amount of throttle valve opening or brake pressure to get the car to this desired acceleration. The model predictive controller performs optimization at each control step to minimize the objective function and achieve the reference values. Usually, the objective function has predetermined and constant weights to meet objectives such as maintain the driver’s desired speed and increase safety and in some cases increase comfort and reduce fuel consumption. In this paper, it is suggested that instead of using constant weights in the objective function, these weights should be determined by a fuzzy controller, depending on the different conditions in which the car is placed. The simulation results show that the variability of the weights of the objective function achieves control objectives much better than the optimization of the objective function with constant weights.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document