Regularized total least squares approach for nonconvolutional linear inverse problems

1999 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 1657-1661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenwu Zhu ◽  
Yao Wang ◽  
N.P. Galatsanos ◽  
Jun Zhang
2010 ◽  
Vol 89 (11) ◽  
pp. 1693-1703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuai Lu ◽  
Sergei V. Pereverzev ◽  
Ulrich Tautenhahn

1995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenwu Zhu ◽  
Yao Wang ◽  
Jenghwa Chang ◽  
Harry L. Graber ◽  
Randall L. Barbour

PAMM ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 1020407-1020408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg Lampe ◽  
Heinrich Voss

Author(s):  
A. F. Emery

Most practioners of inverse problems use least squares or maximum likelihood (MLE) to estimate parameters with the assumption that the errors are normally distributed. When there are errors both in the measured responses and in the independent variables, or in the model itself, more information is needed and these approaches may not lead to the best estimates. A review of the error-in-variables (EIV) models shows that other approaches are necessary and in some cases Bayesian inference is to be preferred.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document