Estimating pixel-scale land cover classification confidence using nonparametric machine learning methods

2001 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1959-1968 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.K. McIver ◽  
M.A. Friedl
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Land Cover Classification ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Pixel Scale

scholarly journals Utilizing Sentinel-1A Radar Images for Large-Area Land Cover Mapping with Machine-learning Methods

2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (2) ◽  
pp. 163-175
Author(s):  
Mohammad Imangholiloo ◽  
Jussi Rasinmäki ◽  
Yrjö Rauste ◽  
Markus Holopainen
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Land Cover Mapping ◽  
Large Area ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Radar Images ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

scholarly journals Development and Application of Earth Observation Based Machine Learning Methods for Characterizing Forest and Land Cover Change in Dilijan National Park of Armenia between 1991 and 2019

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (15) ◽  
pp. 2942
Author(s):  
Nathalie Morin ◽  
Antoine Masse ◽  
Christophe Sannier ◽  
Martin Siklar ◽  
Norman Kiesslich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Land Use ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
National Park ◽  
Forest Degradation ◽  
Forest Monitoring ◽  
Anthropogenic Pressure ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Forest Density ◽  
Machine Learning Methods

Dilijan National Park is one of the most important national parks of Armenia, established in 2002 to protect its rich biodiversity of flora and fauna and to prevent illegal logging. The aim of this study is to provide first, a mapping of forest degradation and deforestation, and second, of land cover/land use changes every 5 years over a 28-year monitoring cycle from 1991 to 2019, using Sentinel-2 and Landsat time series and Machine Learning methods. Very High Spatial Resolution imagery was used for calibration and validation purposes of forest density modelling and related changes. Correlation coefficient R2 between forest density map and reference values ranges from 0.70 for the earliest epoch to 0.90 for the latest one. Land cover/land use classification yield good results with most classes showing high users’ and producers’ accuracies above 80%. Although forest degradation and deforestation which initiated about 30 years ago was restrained thanks to protection measures, anthropogenic pressure remains a threat with the increase in settlements, tourism, or agriculture. This case study can be used as a decision-support tool for the Armenian Government for sustainable forest management and policies and serve as a model for a future nationwide forest monitoring system.

scholarly journals Estimating Surface Downward Longwave Radiation Using Machine Learning Methods

Atmosphere ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (11) ◽  
pp. 1147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chunjie Feng ◽  
Xiaotong Zhang ◽  
Yu Wei ◽  
Weiyu Zhang ◽  
Ning Hou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Land Cover ◽  
Time Scale ◽  
Longwave Radiation ◽  
Surface Radiation ◽  
Gradient Boosting ◽  
Support Vector ◽  
Learning Methods ◽  
Machine Learning Methods ◽  
Downward Longwave Radiation

The downward longwave radiation (Ld, 4–100 μm) is a major component of research for the surface radiation energy budget and balance. In this study, we applied five machine learning methods, namely artificial neural network (ANN), support vector regression (SVR), gradient boosting regression tree (GBRT), random forest (RF), and multivariate adaptive regression spline (MARS), to estimate Ld using ground measurements collected from 27 Baseline Surface Radiation Network (BSRN) stations. Ld measurements in situ were used to validate the accuracy of Ld estimation models on daily and monthly time scales. A comparison of the results demonstrated that the estimates on the basis of the GBRT method had the highest accuracy, with an overall root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 17.50 W m−2 and an R value of 0.96 for the test dataset on a daily time scale. These values were 11.19 W m−2 and 0.98, respectively, on a monthly time scale. The effects of land cover and elevation were further studied to comprehensively evaluate the performance of each machine learning method. All machine learning methods achieved better results over the grass land cover type but relatively worse results over the tundra. GBRT, RF, and MARS methods were found to show good performance at both the high- and low-altitude sites.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document