Performance evaluation of texture measures for ground cover identification in satellite images by means of a neural network classifier

1995 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
pp. 616-626 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.F. Augusteijn ◽  
L.E. Clemens ◽  
K.A. Shaw
Author(s):  
Marco, A. Márquez-Linares ◽  
Jonathan G. Escobar--Flores ◽  
Sarahi Sandoval- Espinosa ◽  
Gustavo Pérez-Verdín

Objective: to determine the distribution of D. viscosa in the vicinity of the Guadalupe Victoria Dam in Durango, Mexico, for the years 1990, 2010 and 2017.Design/Methodology/Approach: Landsat satellite images were processed in order to carry out supervised classifications using an artificial neural network. Images from the years 1990, 2010 and 2017 were used to estimate ground cover of D. viscosa, pastures, crops, shrubs, and oak forest. This data was used to calculate the expansion of D. viscosa in the study area.Results/Study Limitations/Implications: the supervised classification with the artificial neural network was optimal after 400 iterations, obtaining the best overall precision of 84.5 % for 2017. This contrasted with the year 1990, when overall accuracy was low at 45 % due to less training sites (fewer than 100) recorded for each of the land cover classes.Findings/Conclusions: in 1990, D. viscosa was found on only five hectares, while by 2017 it had increased to 147 hectares. If the disturbance caused by overgrazing continues, and based on the distribution of D. viscosa, it is likely that in a few years it will have the ability to invade half the study area, occupying agricultural, forested, and shrub areas


ICANN ’93 ◽  
1993 ◽  
pp. 1010-1013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marijke F. Augusteijn ◽  
Kelly A. Shaw ◽  
Rebecca J. Watson

1997 ◽  
Vol 36 (04/05) ◽  
pp. 349-351
Author(s):  
H. Mizuta ◽  
K. Kawachi ◽  
H. Yoshida ◽  
K. Iida ◽  
Y. Okubo ◽  
...  

Abstract:This paper compares two classifiers: Pseudo Bayesian and Neural Network for assisting in making diagnoses of psychiatric patients based on a simple yes/no questionnaire which is provided at the outpatient’s first visit to the hospital. The classifiers categorize patients into three most commonly seen ICD classes, i.e. schizophrenic, emotional and neurotic disorders. One hundred completed questionnaires were utilized for constructing and evaluating the classifiers. Average correct decision rates were 73.3% for the Pseudo Bayesian Classifier and 77.3% for the Neural Network classifier. These rates were higher than the rate which an experienced psychiatrist achieved based on the same restricted data as the classifiers utilized. These classifiers may be effectively utilized for assisting psychiatrists in making their final diagnoses.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document