Application of the substructure-frontal method for repeated solution of large sparse matrix equations to field problems

1988 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 326-329 ◽  
Author(s):  
Z.-Q. You ◽  
Z.-W. Jiang ◽  
Y.-S. Sun ◽  
L. Udpa
PAMM ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 959-960
Author(s):  
Björn Baran ◽  
Martin Köhler ◽  
Nitin Prasad ◽  
Jens Saak

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 497
Author(s):  
Sanderson L. Gonzaga de Oliveira ◽  
Alexandre A. A. M. Abreu

The need to determine pseudoperipheral vertices arises from several graph-theoretical approaches for ordering sparse matrix equations. Results of two algorithms for finding such vertices, namely, the George-Liu and Kaveh-Bondarabady algorithms, are evaluated in this work along with a variant of the Kaveh-Bondarabady algorithm. Experiments among these three algorithms in conjunction with the Reverse Cuthill-McKee method suggest that the modified algorithm is a suitable alternative for reducing bandwidth of matrices that arise from specific application area, but it is dominated by the well-know George-Liu algorithm mainly when considering the computational times of the algorithms.


Methodology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 89-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leslie Rutkowski ◽  
Yan Zhou

Abstract. Given a consistent interest in comparing achievement across sub-populations in international assessments such as TIMSS, PIRLS, and PISA, it is critical that sub-population achievement is estimated reliably and with sufficient precision. As such, we systematically examine the limitations to current estimation methods used by these programs. Using a simulation study along with empirical results from the 2007 cycle of TIMSS, we show that a combination of missing and misclassified data in the conditioning model induces biases in sub-population achievement estimates, the magnitude and degree to which can be readily explained by data quality. Importantly, estimated biases in sub-population achievement are limited to the conditioning variable with poor-quality data while other sub-population achievement estimates are unaffected. Findings are generally in line with theory on missing and error-prone covariates. The current research adds to a small body of literature that has noted some of the limitations to sub-population estimation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document