Three dimensional magnetostatic field calculation using equivalent magnetic charge method

1991 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 5010-5012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Xu ◽  
Z. Jiang ◽  
Q. Wang ◽  
X. Xu ◽  
D. Sun ◽  
...  
2007 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 115
Author(s):  
Antonio Šarolić ◽  
Borivoj Modlic

In the near field, the antenna pattern provided by the antenna manufacturer is generally not applicable, or shouldbe considered with caution, even for the single antenna in free space. In the real life, antenna is often surrounded by other conductive objects in the immediate vicinity. These objects tend to distort the antenna radiation pattern. Since the electromagnetic field calculation for the coverage or radiation hazard analysis depends on the three-dimensional antenna gain, this effect should be taken into account. This paper suggests the use of "installation uncertainty" that should be added to the field calculation. The amount of this quantity depends on the installation geometry and can be calculated numerically for a specific situation. This paper shows the results of numerical calculations for some typical antenna installation geometries.


2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Magarotto ◽  
D. Melazzi ◽  
D. Pavarin

We have numerically studied how an actual confinement magnetostatic field affects power deposition in a helicon source. We have solved the wave propagation by means of two electromagnetic solvers, namely: (i) plaSma Padova Inhomogeneous Radial Electromagnetic solver (SPIREs), a mono-dimensional finite-difference frequency-domain code, and (ii) Advanced coDe for Anisotropic Media and ANTennas (ADAMANT), a full-wave three-dimensional tool based on the method of moments. We have computed the deposited power spectrum with SPIREs, power deposition profile with ADAMANT and the antenna impedance with both codes. First we have verified the numerical accuracy of both SPIREs and ADAMNT. Then, we have analysed two configurations of magnetostatic field, namely produced by Maxwell coils, and Helmholtz coils. For each configuration we have studied three cases: (i) low density $n=10^{17}~\text{m}^{-3}$ and low magnetic field $B_{0}=250$  G; (ii) medium density $n=10^{18}~\text{m}^{-3}$ and medium magnetic field $B_{0}=500$  G; (iii) high density $n=10^{19}~\text{m}^{-3}$ and high magnetic field $B_{0}=1000$  G. We have found that the Maxwell coil configuration does not produces significant changes in the deposited power phenomenon with respect to a perfectly uniform and axial magnetostatic field. While the Helmholtz coil configuration can lead to a power spectrum peaked near the axis of the discharge.


2019 ◽  
Vol 297 ◽  
pp. 95-104
Author(s):  
Sihem Bouzid ◽  
Nacer Hebbir ◽  
Yamina Harnane

This work concerns the numerical modeling of stationary conduction heat transfer in a 3D three-dimensional anisotropic material subjected to an internal heat source, based on the finite element method MEF and using the Galerkin method. The field of study is a cube representing the seven crystalline systems subjected to an internal heat source and convective boundaries. The obtained equation system is solved by the LU method. The automatic mesh is managed for all the domain nodes via the program which we have written in FORTRAN language. This program allowed temperature field calculation and was applied for different crystalline systems: monoclinic, triclinic, orthorhombic, trigonal, cubic that are identified by their thermal conductivity tensors [kij]. The obtained temperature profiles obtained are in accordance with heat transfer theory and clearly illustrate the crystalline structure symmetry; this calculation permits to predict the possible thermal deformations in an anisotropic solid.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document