scholarly journals Scalar field versus hydrodynamic models in homogeneous isotropic cosmology

2018 ◽  
Vol 97 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. I. Zhdanov ◽  
S. S. Dylda
Keyword(s):  
Scalar Field ◽  
Hydrodynamic Models ◽  
Field Versus ◽  
Isotropic Cosmology

scholarly journals Perturbed dark energy: Classical scalar field versus tachyon

2009 ◽  
Vol 80 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Sergijenko ◽  
Bohdan Novosyadlyj
Keyword(s):  
Dark Energy ◽  
Scalar Field ◽  
Field Versus

scholarly journals Four-form field versus fundamental scalar field

JETP Letters ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 105 (10) ◽  
pp. 682-685
Author(s):  
M. K. Savelainen
Keyword(s):  
Scalar Field ◽  
Field Versus ◽  
Form Field

CSO Modelling Considering Moving Storms and Tipping Bucket Gauge Failures

2007 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Hochedlinger ◽  
W. Sprung ◽  
H. Kainz ◽  
K. König
Keyword(s):  
Hydrological Models ◽  
Rain Intensity ◽  
Hydrodynamic Models ◽  
Data Intensive ◽  
Storm Flow ◽  
Cell Velocity ◽  
Combined Sewer ◽  
Moving Direction ◽  
The Difference

The simulation of combined sewer overflow volumes and loads is important for the assessment of the overflow and overflow load to the receiving water to predict the hydraulic or the pollution impact. Hydrodynamic models are very data-intensive and time-consuming for long-term quality modelling. Hence, for long-term modelling, hydrological models are used to predict the storm flow in a fast way. However, in most cases, a constant rain intensity is used as load for the simulation, but in practice even for small catchments rain occurs in rain cells, which are not constant over the whole catchment area. This paper presents the results of quality modelling considering moving storms depending on the rain cell velocity and its moving direction. Additionally, tipping bucket gauge failures and different corrections are also taken into account. The results evidence the importance of these considerations for precipitation due the effects on overflow load and show the difference up to 28% of corrected and uncorrected data and of moving rain cells instead of constant raining intensities.

scholarly journals CHAOTIC INFLATION ON THE RANDALL–SUNDRUM TWO-BRANE MODEL

2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (31) ◽  
pp. 2697-2713
Author(s):  
KOUROSH NOZARI ◽  
SIAMAK AKHSHABI
Keyword(s):  
Scalar Field ◽  
Field Potential ◽  
Friedmann Equation ◽  
Warp Factor ◽  
Model Parameters ◽  
Stabilization Mechanism ◽  
Brane Model ◽  
Inflation Model ◽  
Bulk Scalar Field ◽  
Chaotic Inflation

We construct an inflation model on the Randall–Sundrum I (RSI) brane where a bulk scalar field stabilizes the inter-brane separation. We study impact of the bulk scalar field on the inflationary dynamics on the brane. We proceed in two different approaches: in the first approach, the stabilizing field potential is directly appeared in the Friedmann equation and the resulting scenario is effectively a two-field inflation. In the second approach, the stabilization mechanism is considered in the context of a warp factor so that there is just one field present that plays the roles of both inflaton and stabilizer. We study constraints imposed on the model parameters from recent observations.

scholarly journals Distinguishing hadronic cascades from hydrodynamic models inPb(160A GeV)+Pbreactions by impact parameter variation

1999 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. R1844-R1845 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Bleicher ◽  
M. Reiter ◽  
A. Dumitru ◽  
J. Brachmann ◽  
C. Spieles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Impact Parameter ◽  
Parameter Variation ◽  
Hydrodynamic Models

CASIMIR EFFECT FOR THE ROBIN SURFACES IN STATIC ROBERTSON–WALKER SPACE–TIME

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (02) ◽  
pp. 161-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
MOHAMMAD R. SETARE ◽  
M. DEHGHANI
Keyword(s):  
Scalar Field ◽  
Energy Momentum Tensor ◽  
Casimir Effect ◽  
Vacuum Expectation ◽  
Robin Boundary Condition ◽  
Momentum Tensor ◽  
Space Time ◽  
Conformally Invariant ◽  
Time Space ◽  
Robin Boundary

We investigate the energy–momentum tensor for a massless conformally coupled scalar field in the region between two curved surfaces in k = -1 static Robertson–Walker space–time. We assume that the scalar field satisfies the Robin boundary condition on the surfaces. Robertson–Walker space–time space is conformally related to Rindler space; as a result we can obtain vacuum expectation values of the energy–momentum tensor for a conformally invariant field in Robertson–Walker space–time space from the corresponding Rindler counterpart by the conformal transformation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document