scholarly journals Quark number fluctuations at finite temperature and finite chemical potential via the Dyson-Schwinger equation approach

2014 ◽  
Vol 90 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xian-yin Xin ◽  
Si-xue Qin ◽  
Yu-xin Liu
Keyword(s):  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Equation Approach ◽  
Quark Number

scholarly journals Quark Number Susceptibilities and Equation of State in QCD at Finite μB

Proceedings ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 5
Author(s):  
Saumen Datta ◽  
Rajiv Gavai ◽  
Sourendu Gupta
Keyword(s):  
Equation Of State ◽  
Taylor Series ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Baryon Number ◽  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider ◽  
Quark Number ◽  
Monte Carlo Studies ◽  
Essential Input ◽  
Beam Energy Scan

One of the main goals of the cold baryonic matter (CBM) experiment at FAIR is to explore the phases of strongly interacting matter at finite temperature and baryon chemical potential μ B . The equation of state of quantum chromodynamics (QCD) at μ B > 0 is an essential input for the CBM experiment, as well as for the beam energy scan in the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider(RHIC) experiment. Unfortunately, it is highly nontrivial to calculate the equation of state directly from QCD: numerical Monte Carlo studies on lattice are not useful at finite μ B . Using the method of Taylor expansion in chemical potential, we estimate the equation of state, namely the baryon number density and its contribution to the pressure, for two-flavor QCD at moderate μ B . We also study the quark number susceptibilities. We examine the technicalities associated with summing the Taylor series, and explore a Pade resummation. An examination of the Taylor series can be used to get an estimate of the location of the critical point in μ B , T plane.

scholarly journals Finite Temperature QCD Sum Rules: A Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-24 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Ayala ◽  
C. A. Dominguez ◽  
M. Loewe
Keyword(s):  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Sum Rules ◽  
Light Quark ◽  
Axial Vector ◽  
Heavy Ion ◽  
Qcd Sum Rules ◽  
Rho Meson ◽  
Ion Collisions ◽  
Rule Method

The method of QCD sum rules at finite temperature is reviewed, with emphasis on recent results. These include predictions for the survival of charmonium and bottonium states, at and beyond the critical temperature for deconfinement, as later confirmed by lattice QCD simulations. Also included are determinations in the light-quark vector and axial-vector channels, allowing analysing the Weinberg sum rules and predicting the dimuon spectrum in heavy-ion collisions in the region of the rho-meson. Also, in this sector, the determination of the temperature behaviour of the up-down quark mass, together with the pion decay constant, will be described. Finally, an extension of the QCD sum rule method to incorporate finite baryon chemical potential is reviewed.

scholarly journals Thermal operator and cutting rules at finite temperature and chemical potential

2006 ◽  
Vol 74 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
F. T. Brandt ◽  
Ashok Das ◽  
Olivier Espinosa ◽  
J. Frenkel ◽  
Silvana Perez
Keyword(s):  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential

Studies on proper time regularization and the QCD chiral phase transition

2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (01) ◽  
pp. 1950003
Author(s):  
Yu-Qiang Cui ◽  
Zhong-Liang Pan
Keyword(s):  
Phase Transition ◽  
Small Parameter ◽  
Effective Mass ◽  
Finite Temperature ◽  
Chemical Potential ◽  
Proper Time ◽  
Chiral Phase ◽  
Chiral Phase Transition ◽  
Njl Model ◽  
The Difference

We investigate the finite-temperature and zero quark chemical potential QCD chiral phase transition of strongly interacting matter within the two-flavor Nambu–Jona-Lasinio (NJL) model as well as the proper time regularization. We use two different regularization processes, as discussed in Refs. 36 and 37, separately, to discuss how the effective mass M varies with the temperature T. Based on the calculation, we find that the M of both regularization schemes decreases when T increases. However, for three different parameter sets, quite different behaviors will show up. The results obtained by the method in Ref. 36 are very close to each other, but those in Ref. 37 are getting farther and farther from each other. This means that although the method in Ref. 37 seems physically more reasonable, it loses the advantage in Ref. 36 of a small parameter dependence. In addition, we also, find that two regularization schemes provide similar results when T [Formula: see text] 100 MeV, while when T is larger than 100 MeV, the difference becomes obvious: the M calculated by the method in Ref. 36 decreases more rapidly than that in Ref. 37.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document