scholarly journals Spatial distributions in static heavy-light mesons: A comparison of quark models with lattice QCD

2011 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Bećirević ◽  
E. Chang ◽  
L. Oliver ◽  
J.-C. Raynal ◽  
A. Le Yaouanc
2018 ◽  
Vol 181 ◽  
pp. 01027 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Mohler

I review recent progress in heavy hadron spectroscopy and from ab-initio Lattice QCD calculations.After motivating lattice calculations for heavy-hadrons by contrasting recent LHCb results charmed and doubly-charmed baryons with lattice predictions, selected resultsfrom scattering calculations for heavy-light mesons and for charmonia are presented.I close with a discussion of recent Lattice QCD predictions of explicitlyexotic doubly-heavy states.


1998 ◽  
Vol 58 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Morénas ◽  
A. Le Yaouanc ◽  
L. Oliver ◽  
O. Pène ◽  
J.-C. Raynal

2018 ◽  
Vol 192 ◽  
pp. 00039 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marco A. Bedolla ◽  
Elena Santopinto

We present a unified formalism for the analysis of mesons. It is provided by a symmetry preserving Schwinger-Dyson-Bethe-Salpeter-Equation (SDBSE) treatment of a vector-vector contact interaction. The contact interaction (CI) model offers a simple-to-implement alternative to perform exploratory studies of QCD, within the SDBSE framework. Within the limitation of this model, we calculate the spectrum of D and B mesons. Our results are in agreement within 2% when compare with experimental data, lattice QCD and other SDBSE calculations involving sophisticated interaction kernels.


2006 ◽  
Vol 21 (04) ◽  
pp. 807-812
Author(s):  
MAKOTO OKA

A review is given to pentaquark mass predictions in quark models and QCD. It is pointed out that no successful quark model prediction is available for low-lying pentaquark states. Some new results of direct application of QCD, QCD sum rules and lattice QCD, are also presented.


2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1543009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alain Le Yaouanc ◽  
Olivier Pène

We first discuss Uraltsev's and other sum rules constraining the B → D**(L = 1) weak transitions in the infinite mass limit, and compare them with dynamical approaches in the same limit. After recalling these well established facts, we discuss how to apply infinite mass limit to the physical situation. We provide predictions concerning semileptonic decays and non-leptonic ones, based on quark models. We then present in more detail the dynamical approaches: the relativistic quark model à la Bakamjian–Thomas and lattice QCD. We summarise lattice QCD results in the infinite mass limit and compare them to the quark model predictions. We then present preliminary lattice QCD results with finite b and c quark masses. A systematic comparison between theory and experiment is performed. We show that some large discrepancies exist between different experiments. Altogether the predictions at infinite mass are in fair agreement with experiment for non-leptonic decays contrary to what happens for semileptonic decays. We conclude by considering the prospects to clarify both the experimental situation, the theoretical one and the comparison between both.


1997 ◽  
Vol 55 (5) ◽  
pp. 3077-3081 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Mihály ◽  
H. R. Fiebig ◽  
H. Markum ◽  
K. Rabitsch
Keyword(s):  

2005 ◽  
Vol 140 ◽  
pp. 455-457
Author(s):  
Craig McNeile ◽  
Chris Michael ◽  
Gavin Thompson
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
Vol 103 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Frezzotti ◽  
M. Garofalo ◽  
V. Lubicz ◽  
G. Martinelli ◽  
C. T. Sachrajda ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Herdoiza ◽  
C. McNeile ◽  
C. Michael

2010 ◽  
Vol 686 (4-5) ◽  
pp. 313-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wojciech Broniowski ◽  
Sasa Prelovsek ◽  
Luka Šantelj ◽  
Enrique Ruiz Arriola

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document