scholarly journals B→D(*)form factors in perturbative QCD

2003 ◽  
Vol 67 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Kurimoto ◽  
Hsiang-nan Li ◽  
A. I. Sanda
2009 ◽  
Vol 24 (31) ◽  
pp. 5845-5860 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. AZIZI ◽  
R. KHOSRAVI ◽  
F. FALAHATI

Using the factorization approach and considering the contributions of the current–current, QCD penguin and electroweak penguin operators at the leading approximation, the decay amplitudes and decay widths of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] transitions, where q = u, d, s and P and V are pseudoscalar and vector mesons, are calculated in terms of the transition form factors of the Bq→Dq and [Formula: see text]. Having computed those form factors in three-point QCD sum rules, the branching fraction for these decays are also evaluated. A comparison of our results with the predictions of the perturbative QCD as well as the existing experimental data is presented.


2003 ◽  
Vol 18 (07) ◽  
pp. 1023-1050 ◽  
Author(s):  
YEGANA V. MAMEDOVA

The light pseudoscalar π0, η and η′ mesons electromagnetic transition γ* + γ* → M form factors FMγ*(Q2,ω) are calculated, applying the perturbative QCD factorization formula and the frozen coupling constant approximation. In the computations the O(αS) order expression for FMγ*(Q2,ω) and the mesons' infrared renormalon corrected distribution amplitudes are used. In the case of the η and η′ mesons, the SUf(3) ordinary octet-singlet mixing scheme is utilized. Comparisons are made with the results obtained, employing the mesons' ordinary distribution amplitudes and with γ + γ* → M transition form factors.


1987 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 165-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chueng-Ryong Ji ◽  
Alan F. Sill ◽  
Roselyne M. Lombard-Nelsen

2017 ◽  
Vol 48 (12) ◽  
pp. 2155
Author(s):  
J. Ablinger ◽  
A. Behring ◽  
J. Blümlein ◽  
G. Falcioni ◽  
A. De~Freitas ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document