scholarly journals Universal texture of quark and lepton mass matrices and a discrete symmetryZ3

2002 ◽  
Vol 66 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshio Koide ◽  
Hiroyuki Nishiura ◽  
Koichi Matsuda ◽  
Tatsuru Kikuchi ◽  
Takeshi Fukuyama
Keyword(s):  
Mass Matrices

Structure of quark mass matrices in the rishon model

1983 ◽  
Vol 121 (5) ◽  
pp. 326-330 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ecker
Keyword(s):  
Quark Mass ◽  
Mass Matrices

Fermionic mass matrices with large neutrino mixing in a GUT scenario

1990 ◽  
Vol 331 (1) ◽  
pp. 213-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoav Achiman ◽  
Jens Erler ◽  
Wolfgang Kalau
Keyword(s):  
Neutrino Mixing ◽  
Mass Matrices

scholarly journals The framed Standard Model (II) — A first test against experiment

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (30) ◽  
pp. 1530060
Author(s):  
Hong-Mo Chan ◽  
Sheung Tsun Tsou
Keyword(s):  
Standard Model ◽  
Renormalization Group Equation ◽  
Fermion Mass ◽  
Group Equation ◽  
Unknown Parameters ◽  
Mass Matrices ◽  
The Standard Model ◽  
Experimental Values ◽  
The Masses ◽  
Independent Parameters

Apart from the qualitative features described in Paper I (Ref. 1), the renormalization group equation derived for the rotation of the fermion mass matrices are amenable to quantitative study. The equation depends on a coupling and a fudge factor and, on integration, on 3 integration constants. Its application to data analysis, however, requires the input from experiment of the heaviest generation masses [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text] all of which are known, except for [Formula: see text]. Together then with the theta-angle in the QCD action, there are in all 7 real unknown parameters. Determining these 7 parameters by fitting to the experimental values of the masses [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], the CKM elements [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and the neutrino oscillation angle [Formula: see text], one can then calculate and compare with experiment the following 12 other quantities [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], [Formula: see text], and the results all agree reasonably well with data, often to within the stringent experimental error now achieved. Counting the predictions not yet measured by experiment, this means that 17 independent parameters of the standard model are now replaced by 7 in the FSM.

NEUTRINO OSCILLATION AND LEPTON MASS MATRIX

1994 ◽  
Vol 09 (01) ◽  
pp. 41-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
KEN-ITI MATUMOTO ◽  
DAIJIRO SUEMATSU
Keyword(s):  
Solar Neutrino ◽  
Phase Structure ◽  
Quark Mass ◽  
Mass Matrix ◽  
Lepton Sector ◽  
Solar Neutrino Problem ◽  
Quark Sector ◽  
Mass Matrices ◽  
Suppression Mechanism ◽  
The Right

We apply the empirical quark mass matrices to the lepton sector and study the solar neutrino problem and the atmospheric vμ deficit problem simultaneously. We show that their consistent explanation is possible on the basis of these matrices. The lepton sector mass matrices need the phase structure which is different from the ones of the quark sector. However, even if the phase structure of the mass matrices is identical in both sectors, an interesting suppression mechanism of sin 2 2θ12 which is related to the solar neutrino problem can be induced from the right-handed neutrino Majorana mass matrix. We discuss such a possibility through the concrete examples.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document